About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
As I said last week, I will stop updating this board after 26th Oct. I heard from one follower and participant on this list that they do find the weekly report useful. If there are more people who find this list useful, perhaps one or some of you can contribute towards the running of this list - it costs £25.99 (+VAT) per month.
This week we saw the biggest climbs from Pepper Hamilton LLP (up 110 places to 152nd), Benesch Law (up 89 places to 209th), and Federal Contracting (up 84 places to 236th).
Well done to this week's top three CMS Cameron McKenna, DLA Piper, and White & Case LLP.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | (1) |
|
CMS Cameron McKenna | 80.1 |
| 2. | (2) |
|
DLA Piper | 80.0 |
| 3. | (3) |
|
White & Case LLP | 79.2 |
| 4. | (4) |
|
Proskauer Rose LLP | 77.9 |
| 5. | (5) |
|
Fox Rothschild LLP | 76.7 |
| 6. | (6) |
|
Gowling WLG UK | 74.9 |
| 7. | (7) |
|
Bird & Bird | 74.7 |
| 8. | (8) |
|
Cozen O'Connor | 72.0 |
| 9. | (9) |
|
Cordell & Cordell | 69.3 |
| 10. | (10) |
|
McCarter English | 68.9 |
| 11. | (11) |
|
Irwin Mitchell | 64.4 |
| 12. | (12) |
|
Baker & McKenzie | 62.7 |
| 13. | (13) |
|
Orrick | 61.4 |
| 14. | (18) |
|
Dentons | 61.1 |
| 15. | (16) |
|
Pinsent Masons | 60.9 |
| 16. | (17) |
|
NortonRoseFulbright | 60.8 |
| 17. | (15) |
|
Burness Paull LLP | 60.6 |
| 18. | (19) |
|
FenwickWest | 60.5 |
| 19. | (14) |
|
Squire Patton Boggs | 60.0 |
| 20. | (21) |
|
Cooley LLP | 59.4 |
| 21. | (22) |
|
Latham & Watkins LLP | 59.3 |
| 22. | (24) |
|
Walker Morris LLP | 59.0 |
| 23. | (27) |
|
Baker Donelson | 58.7 |
| 24. | (26) |
|
Eversheds | 58.1 |
| 25. | (23) |
|
Hogan Lovells | 57.9 |
| 26. | (29) |
|
Allen & Overy | 57.6 |
| 27. | (25) |
|
JONES DAY® | 57.4 |
| 28. | (20) |
|
WilmerHale | 57.1 |
| 29. | (28) |
|
GreenbergTraurig LLP | 56.5 |
| 30. | (43) |
|
Mills & Reeve LLP | 56.2 |
| 31. | (51) |
|
SCHR | 56.0 |
| 32. | (33) |
|
Sidley Austin LLP | 55.8 |
| 33. | (32) |
|
Osborne Clarke | 55.7 |
| 34. | (34) |
|
Burges Salmon | 55.6 |
| 35. | (30) |
|
Trowers & Hamlins | 55.4 |
| 36. | (41) |
|
Wilson Sonsini | 55.4 |
| 37. | (66) |
|
Linklaters LLP | 55.4 |
| 38. | (38) |
|
Mishcon De Reya | 55.3 |
| 39. | (37) |
|
Royds Withy King | 55.2 |
| 40. | (47) |
|
Hodge Jones & Allen | 55.2 |
| 41. | (61) |
|
VWV | 55.1 |
| 42. | (35) |
|
Hymans Robertson LLP | 55.0 |
| 43. | (36) |
|
Kirkland & Ellis | 55.0 |
| 44. | (62) |
|
Clyde & | 55.0 |
| 45. | (56) |
|
Nixon Peabody LLP | 55.0 |
| 46. | (31) |
|
Bad Legal LLP | 54.9 |
| 47. | (50) |
|
HSFlegal | 54.9 |
| 48. | (42) |
|
Corrs (Law Firm) | 54.8 |
| 49. | (44) |
|
Miller Thomson LLP | 54.8 |
| 50. | (39) |
|
Fasken Martineau | 54.6 |
| 51. | (48) |
|
Fieldfisher | 54.5 |
| 52. | (64) |
|
Freshfields | 54.5 |
| 53. | (67) |
|
Simmons & Simmons | 54.5 |
| 54. | (40) |
|
Reed Smith LLP | 54.4 |
| 55. | (52) |
|
Mintz Levin | 54.4 |
| 56. | (54) |
|
Perkins Coie | 54.3 |
| 57. | (53) |
|
Morgan Lewis | 54.2 |
| 58. | (46) |
|
Holland & Knight | 54.0 |
| 59. | (45) |
|
K&L Gates LLP | 54.0 |
| 60. | (59) |
|
Weightmans LLP | 54.0 |
| 61. | (63) |
|
Winston & Strawn LLP | 53.9 |
| 62. | (93) |
|
Ince & Co | 53.8 |
| 63. | (60) |
|
Simpson Millar LLP | 53.7 |
| 64. | (58) |
|
Stephensons | 53.6 |
| 65. | (81) |
|
Shearman & Sterling | 53.5 |
| 66. | (91) |
|
Allens (Law Firm) | 53.3 |
| 67. | (49) |
|
Skadden, Arps | 53.2 |
| 68. | (68) |
|
DACBeachcroft | 53.2 |
| 69. | (79) |
|
DWF LLP | 53.1 |
| 70. | (69) |
|
Goodwin | 53.0 |
| 71. | (65) |
|
Seyfarth Shaw LLP | 53.0 |
| 72. | (57) |
|
Clifford Chance UK | 53.0 |
| 73. | (95) |
|
Husch Blackwell | 53.0 |
| 74. | (73) |
|
Blank Rome LLP | 52.9 |
| 75. | (71) |
|
Clarke Willmott LLP | 52.9 |
| 76. | (100) |
|
McDermott | 52.9 |
| 77. | (70) |
|
Foley & Lardner LLP | 52.8 |
| 78. | (78) |
|
Hill Dickinson LLP | 52.8 |
| 79. | (103) |
|
Browne Jacobson LLP | 52.7 |
| 80. | (55) |
|
BakerHostetler | 52.7 |
| 81. | (85) |
|
Addleshaw Goddard | 52.7 |
| 82. | (146) |
|
Digby Brown LLP | 52.6 |
| 83. | (75) |
|
Covington | 52.5 |
| 84. | (76) |
|
Brodies LLP | 52.5 |
| 85. | (89) |
|
King & Spalding | 52.5 |
| 86. | (83) |
|
@BlakeMorganLLP | 52.4 |
| 87. | (84) |
|
Mayer Brown | 52.3 |
| 88. | (77) |
|
Thompson Coburn LLP | 52.3 |
| 89. | (80) |
|
Ashurst | 52.2 |
| 90. | (92) |
|
MacRoberts LLP | 52.1 |
| 91. | (99) |
|
Shoosmiths | 52.1 |
| 92. | (82) |
|
Jackson Lewis P.C. | 52.0 |
| 93. | (113) |
|
Ramsdens Solicitors | 52.0 |
| 94. | (98) |
|
Torys LLP | 51.9 |
| 95. | (88) |
|
Haynes And Boone LLP | 51.9 |
| 96. | (72) |
|
Fragomen | 51.9 |
| 97. | (97) |
|
Polsinelli | 51.9 |
| 98. | (104) |
|
Your Legal Friend | 51.8 |
| 99. | (74) |
|
O'Melveny & Myers | 51.7 |
| 100. | (94) |
|
Minster Law | 51.7 |
