Social Law Firms 21 Sep 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 21 Sep 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard

This week we saw the biggest climbs from Vorys (up 98 places to 142nd), Kirkland & Ellis (up 65 places to 48th), and DLA Piper Australia (up 63 places to 267th).

Well done to this week's top three DLA Piper, CMS Cameron McKenna, and White & Case LLP.

Rank Law Firm Total Score
1. profile image DLA Piper 80.1
2. profile image CMS Cameron McKenna 79.8
3. profile image White & Case LLP 78.8
4. profile image Proskauer Rose LLP 77.5
5. profile image Fox Rothschild LLP 76.8
6. profile image Gowling WLG UK 73.9
7. profile image Bird & Bird 73.4
8. profile image Cozen O'Connor 71.6
9. profile image Cordell & Cordell 69.4
10. profile image McCarter English 69.3
11. profile image Irwin Mitchell 64.3
12. profile image Baker & McKenzie 61.6
13. profile image Squire Patton Boggs 61.2
14. profile image Burness Paull LLP 61.1
15. profile image NortonRoseFulbright 61.0
16. profile image Orrick 60.2
17. profile image Dentons 60.1
18. profile image FenwickWest 59.8
19. profile image WilmerHale 59.4
20. profile image Pinsent Masons 59.3
21. profile image Cooley LLP 59.0
22. profile image Latham & Watkins LLP 59.0
23. profile image Hogan Lovells 58.1
24. profile image Taylor Wessing LLP 57.8
25. profile image Eversheds 57.7
26. profile image JONES DAY® 57.3
27. profile image Baker Donelson 56.7
28. profile image Trowers & Hamlins 56.5
29. profile image GreenbergTraurig LLP 56.4
30. profile image Sidley Austin LLP 56.2
31. profile image Bad Legal LLP 56.1
32. profile image Hymans Robertson LLP 56.1
33. profile image Allen & Overy 56.1
34. profile image Osborne Clarke 55.9
35. profile image Corrs (Law Firm) 55.9
36. profile image VWV 55.7
37. profile image Reed Smith LLP 55.6
38. profile image Fasken Martineau 55.5
39. profile image Holland & Knight 55.3
40. profile image Walker Morris LLP 55.3
41. profile image Burges Salmon 55.1
42. profile image Nixon Peabody LLP 54.9
43. profile image Mills & Reeve LLP 54.7
44. profile image Morgan Lewis 54.7
45. profile image Clyde & 54.5
46. profile image Fieldfisher 54.5
47. profile image Hodge Jones & Allen 54.5
48. profile image Kirkland & Ellis 54.3
49. profile image K&L Gates LLP 54.2
50. profile image Miller Thomson LLP 54.2
51. profile image Mishcon De Reya 54.1
52. profile image Stephensons 53.9
53. profile image HSFlegal 53.8
54. profile image BakerHostetler 53.8
55. profile image DACBeachcroft 53.8
56. profile image Seyfarth Shaw LLP 53.6
57. profile image Covington 53.5
58. profile image SCHR 53.4
59. profile image Polsinelli 53.2
60. profile image Simpson Millar LLP 53.2
61. profile image Foley & Lardner LLP 53.2
62. profile image Goodwin 53.1
63. profile image Winston & Strawn LLP 53.1
64. profile image Wilson Sonsini 53.0
65. profile image Hill Dickinson LLP 52.9
66. profile image Mayer Brown 52.9
67. profile image Mintz Levin 52.9
68. profile image Jackson Lewis P.C. 52.9
69. profile image Husch Blackwell 52.8
70. profile image Weightmans LLP 52.8
71. profile image King&WoodMallesons 52.7
72. profile image Perkins Coie 52.7
73. profile image Linklaters LLP 52.6
74. profile image Minster Law 52.6
75. profile image Royds Withy King 52.4
76. profile image McDermott 52.4
77. profile image Ince & Co 52.4
78. profile image Thorntons Law LLP 52.3
79. profile image Ballard Spahr LLP 52.3
80. profile image Browne Jacobson LLP 52.3
81. profile image Thompson Coburn LLP 52.1
82. profile image Freshfields 52.1
83. profile image MLex 52.0
84. profile image Harper Macleod LLP 52.0
85. profile image Allens (Law Firm) 52.0
86. profile image Ramsdens Solicitors 51.9
87. profile image Clarke Willmott LLP 51.9
88. profile image King & Spalding 51.9
89. profile image @BlakeMorganLLP 51.9
90. profile image Anderson Strathern 51.9
91. profile image McGuireWoods LLP 51.8
92. profile image Wedlake Bell LLP 51.7
93. profile image Skadden, Arps 51.7
94. profile image Kennedys Law LLP 51.5
95. profile image Thrings Solicitors 51.5
96. profile image Gibson Dunn 51.4
97. profile image Ashurst 51.3
98. profile image Stowe Family Law LLP 51.3
99. profile image Shoosmiths 51.3
100. profile image Haynes And Boone LLP 51.3
  • Bulletin name:
    21 Sep 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 21st Sep 2017
  • Score Period:
    14th Sep - 21st Sep 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 14th Sep 2017
  • Data Sources: