About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.Â
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201. | (204) |
|
Allen Matkins LLP | 47.1 |
| 202. | (199) |
|
Deborah McMurray | 47.0 |
| 203. | (208) |
|
DLA Piper Australia | 46.9 |
| 204. | (198) |
|
Thompson Hine LLP | 46.9 |
| 205. | (209) |
|
Cripps | 46.9 |
| 206. | (91) |
|
Weightmans LLP | 46.9 |
| 207. | (212) |
|
CAPSTICKS | 46.8 |
| 208. | (211) |
|
HollandHart | 46.7 |
| 209. | (207) |
|
TLT TLT | 46.7 |
| 210. | (218) |
|
Withersworldwide | 46.7 |
| 211. | (195) |
|
DLA Piper Canada | 46.7 |
| 212. | (215) |
|
Dinsmore & Shohl | 46.7 |
| 213. | (248) |
|
Watson Farley & Williams LLP | 46.6 |
| 214. | (236) |
|
Kelley Drye & Warren | 46.6 |
| 215. | (200) |
|
StewartsLawLLP | 46.5 |
| 216. | (217) |
|
Dorsey & Whitney | 46.5 |
| 217. | (224) |
|
Loeb & Loeb LLP | 46.4 |
| 218. | (189) |
|
Stephenson Harwood | 46.4 |
| 219. | (193) |
|
Troutman Sanders | 46.4 |
| 220. | (231) |
|
NMM | 46.3 |
| 221. | (210) |
|
Hogan Lovells | 46.3 |
| 222. | (220) |
|
Bircham Dyson Bell | 46.3 |
| 223. | (253) |
|
Forsters LLP | 46.3 |
| 224. | (213) |
|
Butler Snow LLP | 46.3 |
| 225. | (226) |
|
Snell & Wilmer | 46.3 |
| 226. | (222) |
|
Minster Law | 46.3 |
| 227. | (223) |
|
Gide Loyrette Nouel | 46.2 |
| 228. | (206) |
|
Goulston & Storrs | 46.2 |
| 229. | (229) |
|
Moore Blatch | 46.1 |
| 230. | (214) |
|
GrayRobinson, P.a. | 46.1 |
| 231. | (202) |
|
Winckworth Sherwood | 46.1 |
| 232. | (232) |
|
Hinshaw & Culbertson | 46.1 |
| 233. | (230) |
|
Law Firm Marketing | 46.0 |
| 234. | (216) |
|
Gordons LLP | 45.9 |
| 235. | (227) |
|
Angela Wang & Co | 45.9 |
| 236. | (234) |
|
Sterne Kessler | 45.9 |
| 237. | (255) |
|
Basham | 45.8 |
| 238. | (221) |
|
Debevoise & Plimpton | 45.8 |
| 239. | (225) |
|
Sullivan & Worcester | 45.7 |
| 240. | (245) |
|
Dickinson Wright | 45.7 |
| 241. | (238) |
|
Vorys | 45.4 |
| 242. | (241) |
|
Vedder Price | 45.4 |
| 243. | (254) |
|
Archer & Greiner | 45.4 |
| 244. | (239) |
|
Howie, Sacks & Henry | 45.4 |
| 245. | (233) |
|
HFW | 45.3 |
| 246. | (247) |
|
Dykema | 45.3 |
| 247. | (240) |
|
DavisPolkReg | 45.3 |
| 248. | (244) |
|
Sedgwick LLP | 45.3 |
| 249. | (258) |
|
Brown Rudnick | 45.1 |
| 250. | (235) |
|
Carlton Fields | 45.0 |
| 251. | (246) |
|
Kramer Levin | 45.0 |
| 252. | (274) |
|
Waller | 44.9 |
| 253. | (237) |
|
Gillespie Macandrew | 44.9 |
| 254. | (252) |
|
Jackson Walker | 44.9 |
| 255. | (250) |
|
Cadwalader | 44.9 |
| 256. | (242) |
|
Dawson Cornwell | 44.8 |
| 257. | (251) |
|
Clifford Law | 44.8 |
| 258. | (260) |
|
Winthrop & Weinstine | 44.7 |
| 259. | (276) |
|
GreenwoodsSolicitors | 44.5 |
| 260. | (257) |
|
Benesch Law | 44.4 |
| 261. | (256) |
|
Lerner And Rowe | 44.4 |
| 262. | (265) |
|
Turcan Connell | 44.4 |
| 263. | (249) |
|
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind | 44.3 |
| 264. | (261) |
|
Schulte Roth & Zabel | 44.3 |
| 265. | (259) |
|
Day Pitney LLP | 44.2 |
| 266. | (243) |
|
Miller Hendry | 44.2 |
| 267. | (278) |
|
Schnader Harrison | 44.2 |
| 268. | (264) |
|
BuckleySandler LLP | 44.1 |
| 269. | (271) |
|
Flaster/Greenberg | 44.0 |
| 270. | (272) |
|
Cravath | 44.0 |
| 271. | (268) |
|
Stites & Harbison | 44.0 |
| 272. | (262) |
|
Fried Frank | 44.0 |
| 273. | (269) |
|
HBJ Gateley | 43.9 |
| 274. | (275) |
|
Farrer & Co | 43.9 |
| 275. | (263) |
|
WeisbergKainenMark | 43.9 |
| 276. | (280) |
|
Boodle Hatfield LLP | 43.8 |
| 277. | (282) |
|
Jaburg|Wilk | 43.7 |
| 278. | (270) |
|
Chadbourne & Parke | 43.7 |
| 279. | (266) |
|
Davies | 43.7 |
| 280. | (286) |
|
Balfour+Manson LLP | 43.6 |
| 281. | (281) |
|
William Olson | 43.6 |
| 282. | (273) |
|
Brinks Gilson | 43.5 |
| 283. | (288) |
|
Neves Solicitors LLP | 43.4 |
| 284. | (279) |
|
Macfarlanes LLP | 43.4 |
| 285. | (267) |
|
Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland | 43.4 |
| 286. | (277) |
|
Keoghs Law | 43.2 |
| 287. | (285) |
|
Fenwick Elliott LLP | 43.1 |
| 288. | (283) |
|
WINSTEAD PC | 43.1 |
| 289. | (296) |
|
Burford | 42.9 |
| 290. | (290) |
|
Langleys Solicitors | 42.9 |
| 291. | (289) |
|
Schiff Hardin LLP | 42.8 |
| 292. | (314) |
|
Burns & Levinson LLP | 42.4 |
| 293. | (291) |
|
Fladgate LLP | 42.3 |
| 294. | (313) |
|
Burg Simpson | 42.3 |
| 295. | (298) |
|
LaPolt Law | 42.3 |
| 296. | (295) |
|
Reminger Co., L.P.a. | 42.2 |
| 297. | (293) |
|
Infrastructure Law | 42.2 |
| 298. | (284) |
|
Morisons Solicitors | 42.1 |
| 299. | (294) |
|
Beltrami & Co | 42.1 |
| 300. | (303) |
|
Stronachs LLP | 42.1 |
