About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
This week we saw the biggest climbs from Lindsays Solicitors (up 94 places to 193rd), Kasowitz Benson (up 58 places to 308th), and Gowling WLG (up 57 places to 128th).
We welcome our two new law firms Bracewell (176th), and Troutman Sanders (219th). to the Social Law Firms board.
Well done to this week's top three CMS Cameron McKenna, Proskauer Rose LLP, and Fox Rothschild LLP.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | (1) |
|
CMS Cameron McKenna | 79.9 |
| 2. | (2) |
|
Proskauer Rose LLP | 78.2 |
| 3. | (3) |
|
Fox Rothschild LLP | 76.5 |
| 4. | (4) |
|
Cozen O'Connor | 74.1 |
| 5. | (5) |
|
McCarter English | 69.2 |
| 6. | (7) |
|
White & Case LLP | 65.1 |
| 7. | (6) |
|
Irwin Mitchell | 64.1 |
| 8. | (8) |
|
Baker & McKenzie | 61.8 |
| 9. | (11) |
|
DLA Piper | 61.3 |
| 10. | (9) |
|
Dentons | 60.9 |
| 11. | (10) |
|
Allen & Overy | 60.9 |
| 12. | (14) |
|
NortonRoseFulbright | 60.0 |
| 13. | (12) |
|
Morgan Lewis | 59.9 |
| 14. | (13) |
|
Cooley LLP | 59.3 |
| 15. | (16) |
|
Hogan Lovells | 59.3 |
| 16. | (18) |
|
Taylor Wessing LLP | 59.2 |
| 17. | (15) |
|
Eversheds | 58.8 |
| 18. | (20) |
|
Linklaters LLP | 58.5 |
| 19. | (22) |
|
Mills & Reeve LLP | 58.5 |
| 20. | (26) |
|
Latham & Watkins LLP | 58.3 |
| 21. | (17) |
|
FenwickWest | 58.3 |
| 22. | (19) |
|
Pinsent Masons | 58.1 |
| 23. | (27) |
|
GreenbergTraurig LLP | 57.5 |
| 24. | (21) |
|
JONES DAY® | 57.4 |
| 25. | (25) |
|
Bird & Bird | 57.2 |
| 26. | (24) |
|
Orrick | 57.0 |
| 27. | (23) |
|
Freshfields | 56.6 |
| 28. | (42) |
|
@BlakeMorganLLP | 56.6 |
| 29. | (35) |
|
Seyfarth Shaw LLP | 56.1 |
| 30. | (43) |
|
WilmerHale | 56.0 |
| 31. | (36) |
|
Reed Smith LLP | 55.6 |
| 32. | (30) |
|
DWF LLP | 55.5 |
| 33. | (34) |
|
Royds Withy King | 55.5 |
| 34. | (28) |
|
Holland & Knight | 55.4 |
| 35. | (40) |
|
Simmons & Simmons | 55.4 |
| 36. | (32) |
|
Squire Patton Boggs | 55.3 |
| 37. | (29) |
|
Gowling WLG UK | 55.3 |
| 38. | (33) |
|
Osborne Clarke | 55.1 |
| 39. | (45) |
|
Burness Paull LLP | 54.9 |
| 40. | (39) |
|
Fasken Martineau | 54.9 |
| 41. | (31) |
|
Brodies LLP | 54.9 |
| 42. | (37) |
|
Walker Morris LLP | 54.7 |
| 43. | (38) |
|
Mishcon De Reya | 54.5 |
| 44. | (60) |
|
King&WoodMallesons | 54.4 |
| 45. | (41) |
|
Winston & Strawn LLP | 54.4 |
| 46. | (46) |
|
HSFlegal | 54.4 |
| 47. | (49) |
|
Perkins Coie | 54.2 |
| 48. | (47) |
|
Bad Legal LLP | 54.1 |
| 49. | (44) |
|
Ashurst | 53.9 |
| 50. | (57) |
|
SCHR | 53.7 |
| 51. | (48) |
|
Wilson Sonsini | 53.6 |
| 52. | (62) |
|
Corrs (Law Firm) | 53.5 |
| 53. | (50) |
|
Stowe Family Law LLP | 53.5 |
| 54. | (51) |
|
Foley Hoag LLP | 53.5 |
| 55. | (53) |
|
Jackson Lewis P.C. | 53.4 |
| 56. | (72) |
|
RPCLaw | 53.4 |
| 57. | (54) |
|
Fieldfisher | 53.4 |
| 58. | (58) |
|
K&L Gates LLP | 53.2 |
| 59. | (67) |
|
Dechert | 53.1 |
| 60. | (59) |
|
DACBeachcroft | 53.1 |
| 61. | (73) |
|
Skadden, Arps | 53.0 |
| 62. | (55) |
|
Paul Hastings | 53.0 |
| 63. | (52) |
|
Harper Macleod LLP | 52.9 |
| 64. | (56) |
|
Osler | 52.9 |
| 65. | (79) |
|
Fisher Phillips | 52.8 |
| 66. | (64) |
|
Mintz Levin | 52.8 |
| 67. | (82) |
|
Baker Donelson | 52.7 |
| 68. | (63) |
|
Deloitte México | 52.7 |
| 69. | (65) |
|
Bryan Cave LLP | 52.6 |
| 70. | (69) |
|
Nixon Peabody LLP | 52.5 |
| 71. | (70) |
|
BLM | 52.5 |
| 72. | (126) |
|
Hodge Jones & Allen | 52.5 |
| 73. | (68) |
|
Polsinelli | 52.4 |
| 74. | (109) |
|
Littler Mendelson | 52.4 |
| 75. | (99) |
|
Mayer Brown | 52.4 |
| 76. | (75) |
|
Goodwin | 52.4 |
| 77. | (61) |
|
BakerHostetler | 52.3 |
| 78. | (83) |
|
MacRoberts LLP | 52.3 |
| 79. | (76) |
|
Saul Ewing LLP | 52.2 |
| 80. | (78) |
|
Miller Thomson LLP | 52.2 |
| 81. | (71) |
|
Blank Rome LLP | 52.1 |
| 82. | (95) |
|
Addleshaw Goddard | 52.1 |
| 83. | (74) |
|
Shoosmiths | 52.0 |
| 84. | (66) |
|
Allens (Law Firm) | 52.0 |
| 85. | (77) |
|
Trowers & Hamlins | 52.0 |
| 86. | (80) |
|
Steptoe&JohnsonLLP | 52.0 |
| 87. | (122) |
|
Kirkland & Ellis | 51.9 |
| 88. | (85) |
|
Thorntons Law LLP | 51.9 |
| 89. | (102) |
|
Clifford Chance UK | 51.8 |
| 90. | (92) |
|
Ogletree Deakins | 51.8 |
| 91. | (87) |
|
McDermott | 51.7 |
| 92. | (84) |
|
Geldards | 51.7 |
| 93. | (81) |
|
Simpson Millar LLP | 51.7 |
| 94. | (105) |
|
Husch Blackwell | 51.7 |
| 95. | (100) |
|
Penningtons Manches | 51.6 |
| 96. | (94) |
|
Sidley Austin LLP | 51.5 |
| 97. | (93) |
|
Fragomen | 51.5 |
| 98. | (89) |
|
Stephensons | 51.5 |
| 99. | (124) |
|
Thrings Solicitors | 51.4 |
| 100. | (88) |
|
Hymans Robertson LLP | 51.4 |
