Social Law Firms 9 Mar 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 9 Mar 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard Page 3

Rank Law Firm Total Score
201. profile image Russell-Cooke LLP 46.5
202. profile image Arent Fox LLP 46.5
203. profile image Dorsey & Whitney 46.4
204. profile image Howie, Sacks & Henry 46.4
205. profile image DMH Stallard 46.4
206. profile image Your Legal Friend 46.4
207. profile image Bradley 46.3
208. profile image Brownstein Hyatt 46.3
209. profile image Gide Loyrette Nouel 46.3
210. profile image Cripps 46.3
211. profile image LaPolt Law 46.3
212. profile image Hinshaw & Culbertson 46.3
213. profile image Cadwalader 46.3
214. profile image Cordell & Cordell 46.2
215. profile image Basham 46.2
216. profile image Frost Brown Todd 46.2
217. profile image Waller 46.1
218. profile image Shoosmiths 46.1
219. profile image Loeb & Loeb LLP 46.1
220. profile image MMS 46.0
221. profile image Carlton Fields 46.0
222. profile image McDonald Hopkins LLC 46.0
223. profile image Lowenstein Sandler 46.0
224. profile image Jenner & Block 45.9
225. profile image Travers Smith 45.9
226. profile image Moore Blatch 45.9
227. profile image NMM 45.9
228. profile image Minster Law 45.9
229. profile image Hughes Hubbard 45.8
230. profile image Gillespie Macandrew 45.8
231. profile image Neves Solicitors LLP 45.7
232. profile image Miller Canfield 45.7
233. profile image Aird & Berlis LLP 45.5
234. profile image Benesch Law 45.4
235. profile image Dickinson Wright 45.3
236. profile image StewartsLawLLP 45.3
237. profile image Angela Wang & Co 45.2
238. profile image Jackson Walker 45.2
239. profile image Goodmans LLP 45.1
240. profile image Dykema 45.1
241. profile image Schulte Roth & Zabel 45.0
242. profile image Archer & Greiner 45.0
243. profile image Butler Snow LLP 45.0
244. profile image Law Firm Marketing 45.0
245. profile image GreenwoodsSolicitors 44.9
246. profile image Goulston & Storrs 44.9
247. profile image Stephenson Harwood 44.9
248. profile image DavisPolkReg 44.8
249. profile image GrayRobinson, P.a. 44.8
250. profile image Gardere Wynne Sewell 44.8
251. profile image Keoghs Law 44.7
252. profile image Sedgwick LLP 44.7
253. profile image HFW 44.6
254. profile image Forsters LLP 44.6
255. profile image BuckleySandler LLP 44.5
256. profile image Paul, Weiss, Rifkind 44.4
257. profile image WeisbergKainenMark 44.4
258. profile image Willkie 44.3
259. profile image Anderson Strathern 44.3
260. profile image Langleys Solicitors 44.3
261. profile image Vedder Price 44.2
262. profile image Jaburg|Wilk 44.1
263. profile image Stevens & Bolton 44.1
264. profile image Davies 44.1
265. profile image Hunton & Williams 44.1
266. profile image DLA Piper Australia 44.0
267. profile image Flaster/Greenberg 44.0
268. profile image Dinsmore & Shohl 44.0
269. profile image HBJ Gateley 44.0
270. profile image Vorys 43.9
271. profile image Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland 43.8
272. profile image Thompson Hine LLP 43.7
273. profile image Cravath 43.7
274. profile image Law At Work 43.7
275. profile image Stites & Harbison 43.6
276. profile image Winthrop & Weinstine 43.5
277. profile image Gibbons P.C. 43.4
278. profile image Brinks Gilson 43.2
279. profile image WINSTEAD PC 43.2
280. profile image Fried Frank 43.2
281. profile image Fenwick Elliott LLP 43.2
282. profile image CRS_Family 43.1
283. profile image Murthy Law Firm 43.0
284. profile image Clifford Law 42.9
285. profile image Lerner And Rowe 42.9
286. profile image Day Pitney LLP 42.8
287. profile image Burford 42.7
288. profile image Baker & McKenzie MX 42.6
289. profile image Balfour+Manson LLP 42.6
290. profile image Thompson & Knight 42.6
291. profile image Fladgate LLP 42.6
292. profile image Burns & Levinson LLP 42.6
293. profile image Turcan Connell 42.5
294. profile image Morisons Solicitors 42.5
295. profile image Miller & Martin PLLC 42.5
296. profile image Boodle Hatfield LLP 42.4
297. profile image Watson Farley & Williams LLP 42.4
298. profile image KWM EMEA 42.4
299. profile image Schiff Hardin LLP 42.3
300. profile image Gordon & Rees 42.3
  • Bulletin name:
    9 Mar 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    8:00am - 9th Mar 2017
  • Score Period:
    2nd Mar - 9th Mar 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    8:00am - 2nd Mar 2017
  • Data Sources: