Social Law Firms 9 Mar 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 9 Mar 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard

This week we saw the biggest climbs from Freshfields (up 133 places to 65th), Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland (up 114 places to 271st), and Fragomen (up 89 places to 61st).

Well done to this week's top three Proskauer Rose LLP, Fox Rothschild LLP, and Cozen O'Connor.

Rank Law Firm Total Score
1. profile image Proskauer Rose LLP 77.9
2. profile image Fox Rothschild LLP 76.3
3. profile image Cozen O'Connor 71.5
4. profile image McCarter English 69.5
5. profile image White & Case LLP 65.3
6. profile image CMS Cameron McKenna 64.5
7. profile image Cooley LLP 63.4
8. profile image Irwin Mitchell 62.3
9. profile image Baker & McKenzie 61.8
10. profile image FenwickWest 60.7
11. profile image DLA Piper 60.5
12. profile image Morgan Lewis 60.3
13. profile image Taylor Wessing LLP 59.7
14. profile image Dentons 59.5
15. profile image Eversheds 59.0
16. profile image NortonRoseFulbright 58.8
17. profile image Allen & Overy 58.6
18. profile image Bad Legal LLP 58.3
19. profile image JONES DAY® 58.1
20. profile image Orrick 57.5
21. profile image Walker Morris LLP 57.3
22. profile image Mishcon De Reya 57.2
23. profile image Hogan Lovells 56.4
24. profile image Stowe Family Law LLP 56.3
25. profile image Mills & Reeve LLP 56.1
26. profile image Osborne Clarke 56.1
27. profile image Squire Patton Boggs 55.7
28. profile image Linklaters LLP 55.6
29. profile image Clifford Chance UK 55.6
30. profile image GreenbergTraurig LLP 55.6
31. profile image Pinsent Masons 55.5
32. profile image Latham & Watkins LLP 55.2
33. profile image @BlakeMorganLLP 55.2
34. profile image Covington 55.1
35. profile image K&L Gates LLP 54.7
36. profile image Skadden, Arps 54.6
37. profile image Royds Withy King 54.4
38. profile image Goodwin 54.3
39. profile image Reed Smith LLP 54.2
40. profile image Wilson Sonsini 53.9
41. profile image Fasken Martineau 53.9
42. profile image Clyde & 53.7
43. profile image Seyfarth Shaw LLP 53.6
44. profile image Gowling WLG UK 53.5
45. profile image Fisher Phillips 53.5
46. profile image Deloitte México 53.4
47. profile image Bird & Bird 53.2
48. profile image Sidley Austin LLP 53.2
49. profile image Osler 53.2
50. profile image DWF LLP 53.1
51. profile image Mintz Levin 53.0
52. profile image McDermott 52.9
53. profile image Olswang LLP 52.8
54. profile image Michelmores LLP 52.7
55. profile image Dechert 52.6
56. profile image Steptoe&JohnsonLLP 52.4
57. profile image Polsinelli 52.4
58. profile image Bryan Cave LLP 52.3
59. profile image Ashfords LLP 52.3
60. profile image Burges Salmon 52.2
61. profile image Fragomen 52.1
62. profile image Ogletree Deakins 52.1
63. profile image Mayer Brown 52.1
64. profile image Simpson Millar LLP 52.0
65. profile image Freshfields 51.9
66. profile image Addleshaw Goddard 51.9
67. profile image Thrings Solicitors 51.8
68. profile image Geldards 51.8
69. profile image Nixon Peabody LLP 51.7
70. profile image Hymans Robertson LLP 51.7
71. profile image HSFlegal 51.7
72. profile image Harper Macleod LLP 51.6
73. profile image Kirkland & Ellis 51.5
74. profile image Weightmans LLP 51.5
75. profile image MLex 51.5
76. profile image Ballard Spahr LLP 51.5
77. profile image Clarke Willmott LLP 51.5
78. profile image Perkins Coie 51.4
79. profile image Allens (Law Firm) 51.4
80. profile image Littler Mendelson 51.3
81. profile image Ashurst 51.3
82. profile image Bennett Jones 51.2
83. profile image Trowers & Hamlins 51.2
84. profile image Freeth Cartwright 51.2
85. profile image Winston & Strawn LLP 51.2
86. profile image Brodies LLP 51.2
87. profile image Gowling WLG 51.1
88. profile image ShakespeareMartineau 51.1
89. profile image WilmerHale 51.1
90. profile image Pepper Hamilton LLP 51.0
91. profile image Jackson Lewis P.C. 51.0
92. profile image King & Spalding 50.9
93. profile image King&WoodMallesons 50.9
94. profile image Stephensons 50.8
95. profile image Womble Carlyle 50.7
96. profile image Blank Rome LLP 50.7
97. profile image Foley Hoag LLP 50.6
98. profile image Holland & Knight 50.6
99. profile image Corrs (Law Firm) 50.5
100. profile image Faegre Baker Daniels 50.5
  • Bulletin name:
    9 Mar 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    8:00am - 9th Mar 2017
  • Score Period:
    2nd Mar - 9th Mar 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    8:00am - 2nd Mar 2017
  • Data Sources: