Social Law Firms 23 Feb 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 23 Feb 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard Page 3

Rank Law Firm Total Score
201. profile image Bircham Dyson Bell 46.2
202. profile image Schulte Roth & Zabel 46.2
203. profile image Gillespie Macandrew 46.2
204. profile image DMH Stallard 46.1
205. profile image Deborah McMurray 46.1
206. profile image McDonald Hopkins LLC 46.1
207. profile image Loeb & Loeb LLP 46.1
208. profile image Miller Canfield 46.1
209. profile image Dorsey & Whitney 46.1
210. profile image DLA Piper Canada 46.1
211. profile image Brabners LLP 46.1
212. profile image Arent Fox LLP 46.0
213. profile image Howie, Sacks & Henry 46.0
214. profile image Sullivan & Worcester 46.0
215. profile image Travers Smith 45.9
216. profile image Aird & Berlis LLP 45.9
217. profile image Cripps 45.8
218. profile image Your Legal Friend 45.8
219. profile image Jenner & Block 45.7
220. profile image Frost Brown Todd 45.7
221. profile image Cordell & Cordell 45.7
222. profile image Paul, Weiss, Rifkind 45.6
223. profile image Lowenstein Sandler 45.6
224. profile image DavisPolkReg 45.6
225. profile image Goodmans LLP 45.6
226. profile image Butler Snow LLP 45.5
227. profile image Minster Law 45.4
228. profile image Archer & Greiner 45.4
229. profile image Neves Solicitors LLP 45.4
230. profile image Hughes Hubbard 45.3
231. profile image HFW 45.3
232. profile image Benesch Law 45.3
233. profile image Carlton Fields 45.3
234. profile image Angela Wang & Co 45.3
235. profile image Moore Blatch 45.2
236. profile image Foley Hoag LLP 45.2
237. profile image Gordons LLP 45.2
238. profile image Dickinson Wright 45.0
239. profile image Waller 44.9
240. profile image Jackson Walker 44.8
241. profile image Langleys Solicitors 44.8
242. profile image Goulston & Storrs 44.8
243. profile image Gardere Wynne Sewell 44.7
244. profile image Stephenson Harwood 44.7
245. profile image GrayRobinson, P.a. 44.7
246. profile image Law Firm Marketing 44.5
247. profile image Thompson Hine LLP 44.5
248. profile image NMM 44.4
249. profile image Kramer Levin 44.4
250. profile image Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland 44.4
251. profile image Jaburg|Wilk 44.3
252. profile image Anderson Strathern 44.3
253. profile image WeisbergKainenMark 44.2
254. profile image GreenwoodsSolicitors 44.2
255. profile image Hunton & Williams 44.2
256. profile image Dykema 43.9
257. profile image Davies 43.9
258. profile image Dinsmore & Shohl 43.8
259. profile image Keoghs Law 43.7
260. profile image Vorys 43.7
261. profile image Stites & Harbison 43.5
262. profile image Fladgate LLP 43.5
263. profile image Burg Simpson 43.5
264. profile image Turcan Connell 43.5
265. profile image StewartsLawLLP 43.4
266. profile image Cravath 43.4
267. profile image Lerner And Rowe 43.3
268. profile image Brinks Gilson 43.3
269. profile image Baker & McKenzie MX 43.3
270. profile image Miller & Martin PLLC 43.3
271. profile image Clifford Law 43.2
272. profile image Fenwick Elliott LLP 43.2
273. profile image Forsters LLP 43.2
274. profile image Sedgwick LLP 43.2
275. profile image Balfour+Manson LLP 43.2
276. profile image CRS_Family 43.1
277. profile image WINSTEAD PC 43.1
278. profile image HBJ Gateley 43.0
279. profile image Stevens & Bolton 43.0
280. profile image KWM EMEA 42.9
281. profile image Fried Frank 42.9
282. profile image Goldberg & Osborne 42.9
283. profile image Basham 42.9
284. profile image Sterne Kessler 42.8
285. profile image Boodle Hatfield LLP 42.8
286. profile image DLA Piper Australia 42.8
287. profile image Flaster/Greenberg 42.8
288. profile image Day Pitney LLP 42.7
289. profile image Morisons Solicitors 42.6
290. profile image Infrastructure Law 42.5
291. profile image Vedder Price 42.5
292. profile image Macfarlanes LLP 42.5
293. profile image Winthrop & Weinstine 42.4
294. profile image Wright Law Offices 42.3
295. profile image Law At Work 42.3
296. profile image Miller Hendry 42.3
297. profile image Farrer & Co 42.2
298. profile image Curtis Law Firm 42.1
299. profile image Murthy Law Firm 42.1
300. profile image Willkie 42.1
  • Bulletin name:
    23 Feb 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    8:00am - 23rd Feb 2017
  • Score Period:
    16th Feb - 23rd Feb 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
    16 Feb 2017 update
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    8:00am - 16th Feb 2017
  • Data Sources:
    Klout