Social Law Firms 16 Feb 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 16 Feb 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard

This week we saw the biggest climbs from Kelley Drye & Warren (up 156 places to 162nd), GreenwoodsSolicitors (up 72 places to 257th), and Gateley Plc (up 70 places to 100th).

Just one new law firm this week. Please join me in giving a warm welcome to Wierzbowski Eversheds who went straight in at 244th.

Well done to this week's top three Proskauer Rose LLP, Fox Rothschild LLP, and Cozen O'Connor.

Rank Law Firm Total Score
1. profile image Proskauer Rose LLP 77.9
2. profile image Fox Rothschild LLP 76.4
3. profile image Cozen O'Connor 71.7
4. profile image McCarter English 68.5
5. profile image Irwin Mitchell 62.6
6. profile image CMS Cameron McKenna 62.6
7. profile image FenwickWest 61.5
8. profile image Baker & McKenzie 61.1
9. profile image White & Case LLP 60.4
10. profile image Taylor Wessing LLP 60.3
11. profile image JONES DAY® 60.0
12. profile image DLA Piper 59.6
13. profile image Cooley LLP 58.8
14. profile image Bad Legal LLP 57.7
15. profile image Eversheds 57.5
16. profile image Hogan Lovells 57.5
17. profile image Pinsent Masons 57.5
18. profile image Allen & Overy 57.2
19. profile image Orrick 57.2
20. profile image Dentons 56.9
21. profile image NortonRoseFulbright 56.9
22. profile image Mishcon De Reya 56.7
23. profile image GreenbergTraurig LLP 56.3
24. profile image Morgan Lewis 56.3
25. profile image Walker Morris LLP 56.3
26. profile image Mills & Reeve LLP 55.6
27. profile image Goodwin 55.5
28. profile image Reed Smith LLP 55.5
29. profile image Latham & Watkins LLP 54.9
30. profile image Stowe Family Law LLP 54.7
31. profile image Seyfarth Shaw LLP 54.5
32. profile image Sidley Austin LLP 54.3
33. profile image Osborne Clarke 54.2
34. profile image Skadden, Arps 54.1
35. profile image Deloitte México 54.0
36. profile image Clifford Chance UK 53.9
37. profile image Bird & Bird 53.9
38. profile image K&L Gates LLP 53.9
39. profile image Burges Salmon 53.9
40. profile image Royds Withy King 53.7
41. profile image McDermott 53.7
42. profile image Fisher Phillips 53.6
43. profile image @BlakeMorganLLP 53.4
44. profile image Clyde & 53.1
45. profile image Gowling WLG 53.0
46. profile image Linklaters LLP 53.0
47. profile image Simpson Millar LLP 53.0
48. profile image Nixon Peabody LLP 52.9
49. profile image Dechert 52.9
50. profile image Ogletree Deakins 52.7
51. profile image Squire Patton Boggs 52.6
52. profile image Olswang LLP 52.6
53. profile image Pepper Hamilton LLP 52.6
54. profile image Michelmores LLP 52.6
55. profile image Covington 52.5
56. profile image WilmerHale 52.4
57. profile image Harper Macleod LLP 52.4
58. profile image Wilson Sonsini 52.3
59. profile image Ashurst 52.3
60. profile image Littler Mendelson 52.1
61. profile image Mintz Levin 52.1
62. profile image Fasken Martineau 52.0
63. profile image Brodies LLP 51.9
64. profile image Osler 51.9
65. profile image Freshfields 51.9
66. profile image Trowers & Hamlins 51.8
67. profile image Blank Rome LLP 51.7
68. profile image Gowling WLG UK 51.6
69. profile image DWF LLP 51.5
70. profile image Thrings Solicitors 51.5
71. profile image Bryan Cave LLP 51.5
72. profile image Birketts LLP 51.4
73. profile image ShakespeareMartineau 51.3
74. profile image HSFlegal 51.2
75. profile image Addleshaw Goddard 51.2
76. profile image Steptoe&JohnsonLLP 51.2
77. profile image Stephensons 51.0
78. profile image Womble Carlyle 51.0
79. profile image Perkins Coie 51.0
80. profile image Holland & Knight 50.8
81. profile image Ballard Spahr LLP 50.7
82. profile image Mayer Brown 50.6
83. profile image Winston & Strawn LLP 50.6
84. profile image Drinker Biddle 50.6
85. profile image Geldards 50.5
86. profile image Burr & Forman LLP 50.5
87. profile image Ashfords LLP 50.5
88. profile image Foley & Lardner LLP 50.5
89. profile image KattenLaw 50.5
90. profile image Bristows LLP 50.4
91. profile image Kirkland & Ellis 50.4
92. profile image MLex 50.4
93. profile image Jackson Lewis P.C. 50.4
94. profile image Weightmans LLP 50.4
95. profile image Fieldfisher 50.3
96. profile image Ince & Co 50.3
97. profile image Burness Paull LLP 50.2
98. profile image Miller Thomson LLP 50.2
99. profile image McGuireWoods LLP 50.2
100. profile image Gateley Plc 50.2
  • Bulletin name:
    16 Feb 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    8:00am - 16th Feb 2017
  • Score Period:
    9th Feb - 16th Feb 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    8:00am - 9th Feb 2017
  • Data Sources: