Social Law Firms 16 Feb 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 16 Feb 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard Page 3

Rank Law Firm Total Score
201. profile image Russell-Cooke LLP 46.4
202. profile image Baker Botts 46.3
203. profile image Schulte Roth & Zabel 46.3
204. profile image Gide Loyrette Nouel 46.3
205. profile image Lindsays Solicitors 46.3
206. profile image Paul, Weiss, Rifkind 46.2
207. profile image Cordell & Cordell 46.2
208. profile image Loeb & Loeb LLP 46.2
209. profile image Howie, Sacks & Henry 46.2
210. profile image HollandHart 46.2
211. profile image Frost Brown Todd 46.2
212. profile image McDonald Hopkins LLC 46.1
213. profile image DavisPolkReg 46.1
214. profile image Cripps 46.1
215. profile image Hinshaw & Culbertson 46.0
216. profile image Sullivan & Worcester 45.9
217. profile image Minster Law 45.9
218. profile image Miller Canfield 45.8
219. profile image DMH Stallard 45.8
220. profile image Deborah McMurray 45.7
221. profile image Jenner & Block 45.6
222. profile image Lowenstein Sandler 45.6
223. profile image Winckworth Sherwood 45.6
224. profile image Butler Snow LLP 45.6
225. profile image Carlton Fields 45.6
226. profile image Travers Smith 45.5
227. profile image Waller 45.4
228. profile image Angela Wang & Co 45.4
229. profile image Goodmans LLP 45.4
230. profile image NMM 45.4
231. profile image HFW 45.3
232. profile image Basham 45.3
233. profile image Hughes Hubbard 45.3
234. profile image Gordons LLP 45.1
235. profile image Jackson Walker 45.1
236. profile image Moore Blatch 45.1
237. profile image Goulston & Storrs 45.0
238. profile image Foley Hoag LLP 44.9
239. profile image Neves Solicitors LLP 44.9
240. profile image Dickinson Wright 44.9
241. profile image Langleys Solicitors 44.9
242. profile image Archer & Greiner 44.8
243. profile image Arent Fox LLP 44.7
244. profile image Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland 44.7
245. profile image GrayRobinson, P.a. 44.7
246. profile image Benesch Law 44.6
247. profile image WeisbergKainenMark 44.6
248. profile image Anderson Strathern 44.6
249. profile image Law Firm Marketing 44.6
250. profile image Thompson Hine LLP 44.6
251. profile image Kramer Levin 44.5
252. profile image Dinsmore & Shohl 44.5
253. profile image Hunton & Williams 44.4
254. profile image Gardere Wynne Sewell 44.4
255. profile image Jaburg|Wilk 44.3
256. profile image Stephenson Harwood 44.3
257. profile image GreenwoodsSolicitors 44.2
258. profile image Dykema 44.2
259. profile image Cravath 44.0
260. profile image Keoghs Law 44.0
261. profile image Burg Simpson 43.9
262. profile image Vorys 43.8
263. profile image Davies 43.8
264. profile image Chadbourne & Parke 43.8
265. profile image Brinks Gilson 43.7
266. profile image Fladgate LLP 43.6
267. profile image Sedgwick LLP 43.5
268. profile image Baker & McKenzie MX 43.5
269. profile image DLA Piper Australia 43.5
270. profile image Fenwick Elliott LLP 43.5
271. profile image Turcan Connell 43.5
272. profile image Clifford Law 43.5
273. profile image Miller & Martin PLLC 43.5
274. profile image Lerner And Rowe 43.4
275. profile image Stevens & Bolton 43.4
276. profile image Stites & Harbison 43.3
277. profile image Sterne Kessler 43.3
278. profile image Forsters LLP 43.3
279. profile image Balfour+Manson LLP 43.2
280. profile image Fried Frank 43.2
281. profile image WINSTEAD PC 43.1
282. profile image KWM EMEA 43.1
283. profile image Day Pitney LLP 42.8
284. profile image Vedder Price 42.7
285. profile image Goldberg & Osborne 42.7
286. profile image Boodle Hatfield LLP 42.7
287. profile image Morisons Solicitors 42.7
288. profile image Macfarlanes LLP 42.7
289. profile image Flaster/Greenberg 42.6
290. profile image BuckleySandler LLP 42.5
291. profile image Murthy Law Firm 42.5
292. profile image Burford 42.5
293. profile image Burns & Levinson LLP 42.4
294. profile image Infrastructure Law 42.3
295. profile image Lindquist & Vennum 42.2
296. profile image Reminger Co., L.P.a. 42.2
297. profile image CGMB Law Firm 42.1
298. profile image Farrer & Co 42.1
299. profile image Brown Rudnick 42.1
300. profile image CRS_Family 42.0
  • Bulletin name:
    16 Feb 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    8:00am - 16th Feb 2017
  • Score Period:
    9th Feb - 16th Feb 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    8:00am - 9th Feb 2017
  • Data Sources: