About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.Â
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201. | (195) |
|
Winckworth Sherwood | 46.3 |
| 202. | (187) |
|
HFW | 46.3 |
| 203. | (203) |
|
Goulston & Storrs | 46.2 |
| 204. | (214) |
|
Brabners LLP | 46.2 |
| 205. | (207) |
|
Minster Law | 46.2 |
| 206. | (209) |
|
NMM | 46.1 |
| 207. | (183) |
|
MinterEllison | 46.1 |
| 208. | (219) |
|
DLA Piper Canada | 46.1 |
| 209. | (216) |
|
Howie, Sacks & Henry | 46.1 |
| 210. | (223) |
|
Hinshaw & Culbertson | 46.1 |
| 211. | (221) |
|
McDonald Hopkins LLC | 46.0 |
| 212. | (206) |
|
DavisPolkReg | 45.9 |
| 213. | (208) |
|
Aird & Berlis LLP | 45.9 |
| 214. | (210) |
|
Cripps | 45.9 |
| 215. | (322) |
|
MMS | 45.9 |
| 216. | (194) |
|
Angela Wang & Co | 45.9 |
| 217. | (213) |
|
Bradley | 45.8 |
| 218. | (211) |
|
Your Legal Friend | 45.8 |
| 219. | (196) |
|
Polsinelli | 45.7 |
| 220. | (197) |
|
Gardere Wynne Sewell | 45.7 |
| 221. | (205) |
|
Lindsays Solicitors | 45.7 |
| 222. | (204) |
|
Bracewell | 45.4 |
| 223. | (201) |
|
Jenner & Block | 45.4 |
| 224. | (220) |
|
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind | 45.4 |
| 225. | (307) |
|
Goodmans LLP | 45.3 |
| 226. | (233) |
|
Basham | 45.3 |
| 227. | (215) |
|
Butler Snow LLP | 45.3 |
| 228. | (202) |
|
William Olson | 45.3 |
| 229. | (228) |
|
Lowenstein Sandler | 45.2 |
| 230. | (231) |
|
Travers Smith | 45.2 |
| 231. | (225) |
|
Gordons LLP | 45.2 |
| 232. | (230) |
|
Anderson Strathern | 45.1 |
| 233. | (239) |
|
Jackson Walker | 45.1 |
| 234. | (249) |
|
Moore Blatch | 45.0 |
| 235. | (224) |
|
Frost Brown Todd | 45.0 |
| 236. | (232) |
|
Archer & Greiner | 45.0 |
| 237. | (226) |
|
Kramer Levin | 44.9 |
| 238. | (279) |
|
Jaburg|Wilk | 44.9 |
| 239. | (229) |
|
Carlton Fields | 44.8 |
| 240. | (243) |
|
DMH Stallard | 44.8 |
| 241. | (234) |
|
WeisbergKainenMark | 44.8 |
| 242. | (227) |
|
Law Firm Marketing | 44.7 |
| 243. | (246) |
|
Cravath | 44.7 |
| 244. | (247) |
|
Dykema | 44.6 |
| 245. | (236) |
|
Davies | 44.6 |
| 246. | (238) |
|
Benesch Law | 44.5 |
| 247. | (263) |
|
Burg Simpson | 44.5 |
| 248. | (245) |
|
Schulte Roth & Zabel | 44.5 |
| 249. | (240) |
|
Clifford Law | 44.4 |
| 250. | (235) |
|
Stephenson Harwood | 44.4 |
| 251. | (250) |
|
Dickinson Wright | 44.3 |
| 252. | (248) |
|
GrayRobinson, P.a. | 44.2 |
| 253. | (256) |
|
Hunton & Williams | 44.1 |
| 254. | (254) |
|
Thompson Hine LLP | 44.1 |
| 255. | (252) |
|
Arent Fox LLP | 44.0 |
| 256. | (237) |
|
Kaye Scholer | 44.0 |
| 257. | (265) |
|
Hughes Hubbard | 44.0 |
| 258. | (262) |
|
Fried Frank | 44.0 |
| 259. | (242) |
|
KWM EMEA | 43.9 |
| 260. | (270) |
|
Keoghs Law | 43.9 |
| 261. | (241) |
|
Neves Solicitors LLP | 43.9 |
| 262. | (271) |
|
Vorys | 43.9 |
| 263. | (284) |
|
Balfour+Manson LLP | 43.9 |
| 264. | (257) |
|
Flaster/Greenberg | 43.7 |
| 265. | (273) |
|
GreenwoodsSolicitors | 43.7 |
| 266. | (272) |
|
Dinsmore & Shohl | 43.7 |
| 267. | (251) |
|
Waller | 43.7 |
| 268. | (275) |
|
BuckleySandler LLP | 43.7 |
| 269. | (274) |
|
Burford | 43.7 |
| 270. | (267) |
|
Fenwick Elliott LLP | 43.6 |
| 271. | (296) |
|
Sterne Kessler | 43.6 |
| 272. | (277) |
|
Miller & Martin PLLC | 43.6 |
| 273. | (255) |
|
Sedgwick LLP | 43.5 |
| 274. | (253) |
|
DLA Piper Australia | 43.5 |
| 275. | (264) |
|
IM Business | 43.4 |
| 276. | (259) |
|
Fladgate LLP | 43.4 |
| 277. | (282) |
|
Goldberg & Osborne | 43.2 |
| 278. | (266) |
|
Brinks Gilson | 43.1 |
| 279. | (269) |
|
Lerner And Rowe | 43.1 |
| 280. | (261) |
|
Boodle Hatfield LLP | 43.1 |
| 281. | (268) |
|
Infrastructure Law | 43.0 |
| 282. | (276) |
|
Gordon & Rees | 43.0 |
| 283. | (260) |
|
Morisons Solicitors | 42.7 |
| 284. | (278) |
|
Baker & McKenzie MX | 42.6 |
| 285. | (286) |
|
Burns & Levinson LLP | 42.5 |
| 286. | (287) |
|
Vedder Price | 42.5 |
| 287. | (289) |
|
Day Pitney LLP | 42.4 |
| 288. | (288) |
|
Stevens & Bolton | 42.4 |
| 289. | (280) |
|
Lindquist & Vennum | 42.3 |
| 290. | (285) |
|
Stites & Harbison | 42.2 |
| 291. | (283) |
|
Winthrop & Weinstine | 42.2 |
| 292. | (292) |
|
WINSTEAD PC | 42.1 |
| 293. | (293) |
|
Reminger Co., L.P.a. | 42.0 |
| 294. | (291) |
|
Macfarlanes LLP | 42.0 |
| 295. | (295) |
|
Farrer & Co | 41.9 |
| 296. | (321) |
|
Thompson & Knight | 41.8 |
| 297. | (290) |
|
HBJ Gateley | 41.8 |
| 298. | (297) |
|
Pullman & Comley | 41.8 |
| 299. | (294) |
|
DE BUEN R. ABOGADOS | 41.4 |
| 300. | (298) |
|
Schiff Hardin LLP | 41.4 |
