About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
This week, we've got a new #1, 2 and 3 folks!
We saw the biggest climbs from McCarter English (up 222 places to 4th), KattenLaw (up 138 places to 149th), and Cozen O'Connor (up 130 places to 3rd).
Well done to this week's top three Proskauer Rose LLP, Fox Rothschild LLP, and Cozen O'Connor.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | (56) |
|
Proskauer Rose LLP | 78.1 |
| 2. | (74) |
|
Fox Rothschild LLP | 75.9 |
| 3. | (133) |
|
Cozen O'Connor | 70.9 |
| 4. | (226) |
|
McCarter English | 68.3 |
| 5. | (1) |
|
CMS Cameron McKenna | 64.3 |
| 6. | (2) |
|
Irwin Mitchell | 61.4 |
| 7. | (3) |
|
FenwickWest | 61.1 |
| 8. | (9) |
|
Orrick | 60.9 |
| 9. | (23) |
|
White & Case LLP | 60.4 |
| 10. | (5) |
|
Baker & McKenzie | 60.3 |
| 11. | (4) |
|
Morgan Lewis | 59.4 |
| 12. | (11) |
|
Eversheds | 58.5 |
| 13. | (6) |
|
DLA Piper | 58.4 |
| 14. | (18) |
|
Taylor Wessing LLP | 58.4 |
| 15. | (15) |
|
Pinsent Masons | 57.9 |
| 16. | (8) |
|
Dentons | 57.6 |
| 17. | (7) |
|
Cooley LLP | 57.5 |
| 18. | (12) |
|
JONES DAY® | 57.1 |
| 19. | (10) |
|
NortonRoseFulbright | 56.8 |
| 20. | (16) |
|
Bad Legal LLP | 56.8 |
| 21. | (13) |
|
Walker Morris LLP | 56.4 |
| 22. | (20) |
|
Allen & Overy | 56.1 |
| 23. | (14) |
|
Mills & Reeve LLP | 55.9 |
| 24. | (54) |
|
Goodwin | 55.4 |
| 25. | (17) |
|
Latham & Watkins LLP | 55.2 |
| 26. | (32) |
|
Reed Smith LLP | 54.8 |
| 27. | (22) |
|
Hogan Lovells | 54.8 |
| 28. | (41) |
|
McDermott | 54.6 |
| 29. | (40) |
|
Sidley Austin LLP | 54.5 |
| 30. | (19) |
|
Gowling WLG | 54.4 |
| 31. | (21) |
|
Mishcon De Reya | 54.4 |
| 32. | (30) |
|
Stowe Family Law LLP | 54.3 |
| 33. | (39) |
|
Seyfarth Shaw LLP | 54.3 |
| 34. | (28) |
|
GreenbergTraurig LLP | 54.3 |
| 35. | (29) |
|
Royds Withy King | 54.2 |
| 36. | (59) |
|
K&L Gates LLP | 54.0 |
| 37. | (24) |
|
Skadden, Arps | 53.9 |
| 38. | (25) |
|
Simpson Millar LLP | 53.6 |
| 39. | (26) |
|
Osborne Clarke | 53.5 |
| 40. | (52) |
|
Olswang LLP | 53.5 |
| 41. | (27) |
|
Covington | 53.4 |
| 42. | (31) |
|
Bird & Bird | 53.3 |
| 43. | (43) |
|
Osler | 53.3 |
| 44. | (38) |
|
Deloitte México | 53.2 |
| 45. | (33) |
|
Fisher Phillips | 53.1 |
| 46. | (37) |
|
Dechert | 52.8 |
| 47. | (44) |
|
Harper Macleod LLP | 52.7 |
| 48. | (35) |
|
HSFlegal | 52.7 |
| 49. | (50) |
|
Nixon Peabody LLP | 52.6 |
| 50. | (70) |
|
Thrings Solicitors | 52.6 |
| 51. | (34) |
|
WilmerHale | 52.6 |
| 52. | (46) |
|
Brodies LLP | 52.6 |
| 53. | (42) |
|
Ogletree Deakins | 52.6 |
| 54. | (51) |
|
@BlakeMorganLLP | 52.4 |
| 55. | (47) |
|
Michelmores LLP | 52.4 |
| 56. | (36) |
|
Squire Patton Boggs | 52.4 |
| 57. | (57) |
|
Linklaters LLP | 52.3 |
| 58. | (48) |
|
Wilson Sonsini | 52.1 |
| 59. | (45) |
|
Mintz Levin | 52.1 |
| 60. | (62) |
|
Hymans Robertson LLP | 51.7 |
| 61. | (49) |
|
Clyde & | 51.7 |
| 62. | (55) |
|
Jackson Lewis P.C. | 51.6 |
| 63. | (61) |
|
DWF LLP | 51.5 |
| 64. | (60) |
|
Gowling WLG UK | 51.5 |
| 65. | (66) |
|
Holland & Knight | 51.5 |
| 66. | (63) |
|
Fasken Martineau | 51.5 |
| 67. | (68) |
|
Perkins Coie | 51.3 |
| 68. | (97) |
|
LaPolt Law | 51.2 |
| 69. | (58) |
|
Ince & Co | 51.2 |
| 70. | (72) |
|
Ashurst | 51.2 |
| 71. | (128) |
|
Clifford Chance UK | 51.2 |
| 72. | (65) |
|
Geldards | 51.1 |
| 73. | (53) |
|
Ashfords LLP | 51.1 |
| 74. | (69) |
|
Foley & Lardner LLP | 51.0 |
| 75. | (84) |
|
BLPLaw | 51.0 |
| 76. | (64) |
|
Bristows LLP | 50.9 |
| 77. | (82) |
|
Burness Paull LLP | 50.9 |
| 78. | (85) |
|
Miller Thomson LLP | 50.6 |
| 79. | (78) |
|
Burr & Forman LLP | 50.6 |
| 80. | (76) |
|
Addleshaw Goddard | 50.6 |
| 81. | (88) |
|
Burges Salmon | 50.5 |
| 82. | (67) |
|
Littler Mendelson | 50.4 |
| 83. | (83) |
|
Freshfields | 50.4 |
| 84. | (79) |
|
Blank Rome LLP | 50.4 |
| 85. | (77) |
|
Hill Dickinson LLP | 50.3 |
| 86. | (95) |
|
Weightmans LLP | 50.3 |
| 87. | (75) |
|
Weil | 50.2 |
| 88. | (71) |
|
King&WoodMallesons | 50.2 |
| 89. | (92) |
|
Akin Gump | 50.1 |
| 90. | (91) |
|
Mayer Brown | 50.1 |
| 91. | (80) |
|
Birketts LLP | 50.1 |
| 92. | (86) |
|
MLex | 50.1 |
| 93. | (139) |
|
Ballard Spahr LLP | 50.0 |
| 94. | (100) |
|
Sullivan & Cromwell | 50.0 |
| 95. | (87) |
|
Foley Hoag LLP | 49.9 |
| 96. | (115) |
|
Kirkland & Ellis | 49.9 |
| 97. | (90) |
|
Trowers & Hamlins | 49.8 |
| 98. | (101) |
|
Baker Donelson | 49.8 |
| 99. | (96) |
|
MacRoberts LLP | 49.8 |
| 100. | (73) |
|
Allens (Law Firm) | 49.8 |
