About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.Â
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201. | (230) |
|
Loeb & Loeb LLP | 47.1 |
| 202. | (225) |
|
Butler Snow LLP | 47.1 |
| 203. | (205) |
|
Lowenstein Sandler | 47.0 |
| 204. | (204) |
|
Angela Wang & Co | 47.0 |
| 205. | (202) |
|
Buchanan | 47.0 |
| 206. | (203) |
|
Troutman Sanders | 47.0 |
| 207. | (189) |
|
Hunton & Williams | 46.9 |
| 208. | (199) |
|
Burford | 46.9 |
| 209. | (209) |
|
DMH Stallard | 46.9 |
| 210. | (222) |
|
Knobbe Martens | 46.8 |
| 211. | (213) |
|
Debevoise & Plimpton | 46.7 |
| 212. | (214) |
|
Farrer & Co | 46.6 |
| 213. | (215) |
|
Law Firm Marketing | 46.5 |
| 214. | (212) |
|
LaPolt Law | 46.5 |
| 215. | (211) |
|
DLA Piper Canada | 46.5 |
| 216. | (216) |
|
Arent Fox LLP | 46.4 |
| 217. | (206) |
|
Dorsey & Whitney | 46.4 |
| 218. | (257) |
|
Schnader Harrison | 46.4 |
| 219. | (208) |
|
MMS | 46.4 |
| 220. | (224) |
|
Morisons Solicitors | 46.3 |
| 221. | (217) |
|
WINSTEAD PC | 46.3 |
| 222. | (210) |
|
Gide Loyrette Nouel | 46.3 |
| 223. | (226) |
|
Travers Smith | 46.2 |
| 224. | (221) |
|
Jaburg|Wilk | 46.2 |
| 225. | (249) |
|
Snell & Wilmer | 46.1 |
| 226. | (218) |
|
Winckworth Sherwood | 46.1 |
| 227. | (227) |
|
Benesch Law | 46.0 |
| 228. | (236) |
|
Kelley Drye & Warren | 46.0 |
| 229. | (242) |
|
DLA Piper Australia | 46.0 |
| 230. | (235) |
|
Stevens & Bolton | 46.0 |
| 231. | (240) |
|
NMM | 45.9 |
| 232. | (220) |
|
Gillespie Macandrew | 45.9 |
| 233. | (239) |
|
Hinshaw & Culbertson | 45.9 |
| 234. | (243) |
|
Langleys Solicitors | 45.8 |
| 235. | (237) |
|
Carlton Fields | 45.8 |
| 236. | (231) |
|
Sullivan & Worcester | 45.8 |
| 237. | (219) |
|
Waller | 45.8 |
| 238. | (238) |
|
GrayRobinson, P.a. | 45.6 |
| 239. | (232) |
|
Goulston & Storrs | 45.5 |
| 240. | (234) |
|
Turcan Connell | 45.5 |
| 241. | (229) |
|
Jackson Walker | 45.5 |
| 242. | (254) |
|
Brownstein Hyatt | 45.4 |
| 243. | (252) |
|
Gardere Wynne Sewell | 45.4 |
| 244. | (265) |
|
Howie, Sacks & Henry | 45.3 |
| 245. | (223) |
|
Balfour+Manson LLP | 45.3 |
| 246. | (241) |
|
Vedder Price | 45.3 |
| 247. | (244) |
|
Dickinson Wright | 45.2 |
| 248. | (233) |
|
Federal Contracting | 45.2 |
| 249. | (248) |
|
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind | 45.2 |
| 250. | (246) |
|
DavisPolkReg | 45.2 |
| 251. | (245) |
|
Fenwick Elliott LLP | 45.1 |
| 252. | (264) |
|
Archer & Greiner | 45.0 |
| 253. | (268) |
|
Keoghs Law | 44.9 |
| 254. | (250) |
|
Dinsmore & Shohl | 44.8 |
| 255. | (251) |
|
Forsters LLP | 44.7 |
| 256. | (263) |
|
Brown Rudnick | 44.7 |
| 257. | (260) |
|
Kramer Levin | 44.6 |
| 258. | (253) |
|
StewartsLawLLP | 44.6 |
| 259. | (258) |
|
GreenwoodsSolicitors | 44.5 |
| 260. | (259) |
|
McDonald Hopkins LLC | 44.5 |
| 261. | (278) |
|
BuckleySandler LLP | 44.5 |
| 262. | (273) |
|
Sedgwick LLP | 44.4 |
| 263. | (255) |
|
Gibbons P.C. | 44.4 |
| 264. | (247) |
|
Deborah McMurray | 44.4 |
| 265. | (285) |
|
Watson Farley & Williams LLP | 44.3 |
| 266. | (256) |
|
Cadwalader | 44.2 |
| 267. | (271) |
|
Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland | 44.1 |
| 268. | (269) |
|
Clifford Law | 44.1 |
| 269. | (288) |
|
William Olson | 44.1 |
| 270. | (261) |
|
Thompson Hine LLP | 44.1 |
| 271. | (284) |
|
Thompson & Knight | 44.0 |
| 272. | (266) |
|
Macfarlanes LLP | 43.9 |
| 273. | (272) |
|
Hughes Hubbard | 43.9 |
| 274. | (280) |
|
Baker & McKenzie MX | 43.8 |
| 275. | (270) |
|
Brinks Gilson | 43.8 |
| 276. | (274) |
|
Fladgate LLP | 43.7 |
| 277. | (275) |
|
DE BUEN R. ABOGADOS | 43.7 |
| 278. | (283) |
|
Flaster/Greenberg | 43.6 |
| 279. | (282) |
|
Day Pitney LLP | 43.3 |
| 280. | (279) |
|
Dykema | 43.3 |
| 281. | (267) |
|
Lerner And Rowe | 43.2 |
| 282. | (281) |
|
Burg Simpson | 43.2 |
| 283. | (292) |
|
Schiff Hardin LLP | 43.1 |
| 284. | (277) |
|
Boodle Hatfield LLP | 43.1 |
| 285. | (291) |
|
WeisbergKainenMark | 42.9 |
| 286. | (297) |
|
BBM Solicitors | 42.9 |
| 287. | (300) |
|
Sandler Travis, PA | 42.8 |
| 288. | (287) |
|
Cravath | 42.7 |
| 289. | (276) |
|
Fried Frank | 42.7 |
| 290. | (295) |
|
IM Business | 42.6 |
| 291. | (290) |
|
Burns & Levinson LLP | 42.6 |
| 292. | (316) |
|
Willkie | 42.5 |
| 293. | (307) |
|
Miller Hendry | 42.5 |
| 294. | (294) |
|
Stites & Harbison | 42.5 |
| 295. | (296) |
|
Schulte Roth & Zabel | 42.4 |
| 296. | (289) |
|
CGMB Law Firm | 42.4 |
| 297. | (306) |
|
Pullman & Comley | 42.3 |
| 298. | (293) |
|
PilieroMazza | 42.3 |
| 299. | (305) |
|
Reminger Co., L.P.a. | 42.3 |
| 300. | (298) |
|
Stronachs LLP | 42.3 |
