About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.Â
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201. | (229) |
|
Stephenson Harwood | 47.0 |
| 202. | (219) |
|
Farrer & Co | 47.0 |
| 203. | (203) |
|
Buchanan | 46.9 |
| 204. | (227) |
|
Arent Fox LLP | 46.9 |
| 205. | (208) |
|
Lowenstein Sandler | 46.9 |
| 206. | (201) |
|
Turcan Connell | 46.8 |
| 207. | (216) |
|
Cripps | 46.8 |
| 208. | (199) |
|
Waller | 46.8 |
| 209. | (202) |
|
Gowling WLG | 46.8 |
| 210. | (209) |
|
Jackson Walker | 46.7 |
| 211. | (217) |
|
DLA Piper Canada | 46.7 |
| 212. | (206) |
|
Deborah McMurray | 46.6 |
| 213. | (189) |
|
Miller Canfield | 46.6 |
| 214. | (223) |
|
Law Firm Marketing | 46.6 |
| 215. | (207) |
|
Knobbe Martens | 46.6 |
| 216. | (211) |
|
Gide Loyrette Nouel | 46.5 |
| 217. | (210) |
|
Morisons Solicitors | 46.5 |
| 218. | (221) |
|
Sullivan & Worcester | 46.4 |
| 219. | (213) |
|
DMH Stallard | 46.4 |
| 220. | (218) |
|
Moore Blatch | 46.4 |
| 221. | (247) |
|
Loeb & Loeb LLP | 46.3 |
| 222. | (239) |
|
Gillespie Macandrew | 46.2 |
| 223. | (228) |
|
Balfour+Manson LLP | 46.2 |
| 224. | (230) |
|
Goulston & Storrs | 46.2 |
| 225. | (212) |
|
LaPolt Law | 46.1 |
| 226. | (248) |
|
Carlton Fields | 46.1 |
| 227. | (225) |
|
Debevoise & Plimpton | 45.8 |
| 228. | (214) |
|
Dinsmore & Shohl | 45.8 |
| 229. | (215) |
|
Winckworth Sherwood | 45.8 |
| 230. | (234) |
|
Dickinson Wright | 45.7 |
| 231. | (235) |
|
NMM | 45.7 |
| 232. | (226) |
|
Stevens & Bolton | 45.6 |
| 233. | (255) |
|
Jaburg|Wilk | 45.5 |
| 234. | (224) |
|
Gibbons P.C. | 45.5 |
| 235. | (232) |
|
Snell & Wilmer | 45.4 |
| 236. | (254) |
|
DavisPolkReg | 45.4 |
| 237. | (245) |
|
Hinshaw & Culbertson | 45.3 |
| 238. | (238) |
|
Brownstein Hyatt | 45.3 |
| 239. | (222) |
|
Archer & Greiner | 45.2 |
| 240. | (242) |
|
Gardere Wynne Sewell | 45.2 |
| 241. | (236) |
|
Lerner And Rowe | 45.1 |
| 242. | (233) |
|
Howie, Sacks & Henry | 45.1 |
| 243. | (262) |
|
Kelley Drye & Warren | 45.1 |
| 244. | (246) |
|
Davies | 45.0 |
| 245. | (249) |
|
Cadwalader | 44.9 |
| 246. | (308) |
|
Hughes Hubbard | 44.9 |
| 247. | (237) |
|
Forsters LLP | 44.9 |
| 248. | (231) |
|
Vedder Price | 44.9 |
| 249. | (241) |
|
WINSTEAD PC | 44.9 |
| 250. | (264) |
|
Schnader Harrison | 44.9 |
| 251. | (250) |
|
GreenwoodsSolicitors | 44.8 |
| 252. | (240) |
|
Travers Smith | 44.7 |
| 253. | (252) |
|
Langleys Solicitors | 44.7 |
| 254. | (244) |
|
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind | 44.6 |
| 255. | (243) |
|
Boodle Hatfield LLP | 44.6 |
| 256. | (256) |
|
Dykema | 44.6 |
| 257. | (265) |
|
Baker & McKenzie MX | 44.6 |
| 258. | (259) |
|
Butler Snow LLP | 44.6 |
| 259. | (268) |
|
GrayRobinson, P.a. | 44.5 |
| 260. | (253) |
|
Sedgwick LLP | 44.5 |
| 261. | (257) |
|
McDonald Hopkins LLC | 44.5 |
| 262. | (158) |
|
Pepper Hamilton LLP | 44.4 |
| 263. | (266) |
|
Clifford Law | 44.3 |
| 264. | (258) |
|
Macfarlanes LLP | 44.3 |
| 265. | (261) |
|
Flaster/Greenberg | 44.3 |
| 266. | (251) |
|
Lindquist & Vennum | 44.2 |
| 267. | (281) |
|
Burg Simpson | 44.0 |
| 268. | (263) |
|
StewartsLawLLP | 44.0 |
| 269. | (270) |
|
Thompson Hine LLP | 44.0 |
| 270. | (260) |
|
BuckleySandler LLP | 44.0 |
| 271. | (267) |
|
Fried Frank | 43.9 |
| 272. | (271) |
|
Keoghs Law | 43.7 |
| 273. | (283) |
|
Neves Solicitors LLP | 43.7 |
| 274. | (275) |
|
Thompson & Knight | 43.6 |
| 275. | (279) |
|
Brown Rudnick | 43.6 |
| 276. | (273) |
|
Brinks Gilson | 43.6 |
| 277. | (276) |
|
Kramer Levin | 43.5 |
| 278. | (277) |
|
Burns & Levinson LLP | 43.5 |
| 279. | (274) |
|
BBM Solicitors | 43.5 |
| 280. | (289) |
|
Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland | 43.4 |
| 281. | (272) |
|
DE BUEN R. ABOGADOS | 43.3 |
| 282. | (269) |
|
DLA Piper Australia | 43.3 |
| 283. | (282) |
|
Cravath | 43.3 |
| 284. | (287) |
|
Watson Farley & Williams LLP | 43.2 |
| 285. | (278) |
|
Schulte Roth & Zabel | 43.0 |
| 286. | (280) |
|
William Olson | 43.0 |
| 287. | (288) |
|
Stites & Harbison | 42.6 |
| 288. | (290) |
|
Fenwick Elliott LLP | 42.6 |
| 289. | (285) |
|
Day Pitney LLP | 42.5 |
| 290. | (296) |
|
PilieroMazza | 42.4 |
| 291. | (292) |
|
Winthrop & Weinstine | 42.3 |
| 292. | (286) |
|
Miller Hendry | 42.2 |
| 293. | (294) |
|
WeisbergKainenMark | 42.0 |
| 294. | (293) |
|
Reminger Co., L.P.a. | 41.9 |
| 295. | (309) |
|
Law At Work | 41.9 |
| 296. | (291) |
|
Schiff Hardin LLP | 41.9 |
| 297. | (299) |
|
Gordon & Rees | 41.8 |
| 298. | (220) |
|
Benesch Law | 41.8 |
| 299. | (314) |
|
Pullman & Comley | 41.8 |
| 300. | (301) |
|
Foster LLP | 41.8 |
