Social Law Firms 14 Sep 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 14 Sep 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard Page 3

Rank Law Firm Total Score
201. profile image Lowenstein Sandler 47.0
202. profile image HollandHart 46.9
203. profile image Balfour+Manson LLP 46.9
204. profile image Clifford Chance NL 46.8
205. profile image Bradley 46.8
206. profile image Frost Brown Todd 46.7
207. profile image Law Firm Marketing 46.7
208. profile image Benesch Law 46.7
209. profile image DMH Stallard 46.7
210. profile image Bracewell 46.7
211. profile image Goodmans LLP 46.5
212. profile image Bircham Dyson Bell 46.5
213. profile image Turcan Connell 46.5
214. profile image Stephenson Harwood 46.5
215. profile image Dinsmore & Shohl 46.2
216. profile image Moore Blatch 46.2
217. profile image Troutman Sanders 46.1
218. profile image Buchanan 46.1
219. profile image Waller 46.0
220. profile image Cripps 46.0
221. profile image Dawson Cornwell 45.9
222. profile image Snell & Wilmer 45.9
223. profile image Gibbons P.C. 45.8
224. profile image Sullivan & Worcester 45.8
225. profile image Sedgwick LLP 45.8
226. profile image WINSTEAD PC 45.7
227. profile image Hughes Hubbard 45.7
228. profile image MMS 45.6
229. profile image Gide Loyrette Nouel 45.5
230. profile image Jaburg|Wilk 45.5
231. profile image NMM 45.5
232. profile image Stevens & Bolton 45.4
233. profile image Flaster/Greenberg 45.4
234. profile image Farrer & Co 45.3
235. profile image Dickinson Wright 45.2
236. profile image Deborah McMurray 45.2
237. profile image Howie, Sacks & Henry 45.2
238. profile image Debevoise & Plimpton 45.2
239. profile image Hinshaw & Culbertson 45.2
240. profile image Vorys 45.1
241. profile image Goulston & Storrs 45.1
242. profile image GrayRobinson, P.a. 45.0
243. profile image Gardere Wynne Sewell 45.0
244. profile image McDonald Hopkins LLC 45.0
245. profile image Butler Snow LLP 45.0
246. profile image Loeb & Loeb LLP 44.9
247. profile image Forsters LLP 44.9
248. profile image Thompson Hine LLP 44.9
249. profile image Davies 44.8
250. profile image Fried Frank 44.7
251. profile image Brownstein Hyatt 44.7
252. profile image GreenwoodsSolicitors 44.6
253. profile image Brinks Gilson 44.6
254. profile image Travers Smith 44.6
255. profile image Vedder Price 44.5
256. profile image Baker & McKenzie MX 44.5
257. profile image Dykema 44.5
258. profile image Cadwalader 44.4
259. profile image Schnader Harrison 44.3
260. profile image Gillespie Macandrew 44.3
261. profile image Kelley Drye & Warren 44.2
262. profile image Carlton Fields 44.2
263. profile image Archer & Greiner 44.2
264. profile image StewartsLawLLP 44.1
265. profile image Thompson & Knight 44.1
266. profile image DE BUEN R. ABOGADOS 44.0
267. profile image Arent Fox LLP 44.0
268. profile image William Olson 43.9
269. profile image Keoghs Law 43.8
270. profile image BBM Solicitors 43.6
271. profile image Stites & Harbison 43.6
272. profile image Kramer Levin 43.6
273. profile image Lerner And Rowe 43.6
274. profile image Day Pitney LLP 43.6
275. profile image DavisPolkReg 43.5
276. profile image BuckleySandler LLP 43.5
277. profile image Winthrop & Weinstine 43.5
278. profile image Cravath 43.4
279. profile image Boodle Hatfield LLP 43.2
280. profile image Clifford Law 43.1
281. profile image Brown Rudnick 43.1
282. profile image WeisbergKainenMark 43.1
283. profile image Paul, Weiss, Rifkind 42.9
284. profile image Schulte Roth & Zabel 42.8
285. profile image Neves Solicitors LLP 42.8
286. profile image Miller Hendry 42.7
287. profile image Macfarlanes LLP 42.7
288. profile image Schiff Hardin LLP 42.6
289. profile image Burg Simpson 42.5
290. profile image Watson Farley & Williams LLP 42.4
291. profile image Fenwick Elliott LLP 42.4
292. profile image Kasowitz Benson 42.3
293. profile image Langleys Solicitors 42.2
294. profile image Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland 42.1
295. profile image Sterne Kessler 42.0
296. profile image Gordon & Rees 42.0
297. profile image Infrastructure Law 42.0
298. profile image Burns & Levinson LLP 41.9
299. profile image Willkie 41.7
300. profile image Law At Work 41.6
  • Bulletin name:
    14 Sep 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 14th Sep 2017
  • Score Period:
    7th Sep - 14th Sep 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 7th Sep 2017
  • Data Sources: