Social Law Firms 10 Aug 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 10 Aug 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard Page 3

Rank Law Firm Total Score
201. profile image DMH Stallard 46.7
202. profile image Troutman Sanders 46.7
203. profile image Thompson Hine LLP 46.6
204. profile image Jenner & Block 46.6
205. profile image Paul Hastings 46.5
206. profile image Cordell & Cordell 46.3
207. profile image Aird & Berlis LLP 46.3
208. profile image Dawson Cornwell 46.2
209. profile image Cripps 46.2
210. profile image Goulston & Storrs 46.2
211. profile image Minster Law 46.2
212. profile image Kasowitz Benson 46.1
213. profile image Moore Blatch 46.1
214. profile image Withersworldwide 46.0
215. profile image Lowenstein Sandler 45.9
216. profile image Archer & Greiner 45.9
217. profile image DLA Piper Canada 45.8
218. profile image Balfour+Manson LLP 45.8
219. profile image Hughes Hubbard 45.7
220. profile image Travers Smith 45.7
221. profile image Arent Fox LLP 45.7
222. profile image Flaster/Greenberg 45.7
223. profile image Loeb & Loeb LLP 45.7
224. profile image Goodmans LLP 45.6
225. profile image DavisPolkReg 45.5
226. profile image Gardere Wynne Sewell 45.5
227. profile image Dinsmore & Shohl 45.5
228. profile image Jackson Walker 45.5
229. profile image Law Firm Marketing 45.4
230. profile image Hinshaw & Culbertson 45.4
231. profile image Snell & Wilmer 45.4
232. profile image Frost Brown Todd 45.4
233. profile image DLA Piper Australia 45.4
234. profile image Howie, Sacks & Henry 45.3
235. profile image GreenwoodsSolicitors 45.2
236. profile image Brownstein Hyatt 45.1
237. profile image Waller 45.1
238. profile image Kelley Drye & Warren 45.1
239. profile image Stevens & Bolton 45.1
240. profile image Cravath 45.0
241. profile image Benesch Law 45.0
242. profile image Davies 45.0
243. profile image Pepper Hamilton LLP 44.9
244. profile image NMM 44.9
245. profile image Forsters LLP 44.9
246. profile image Paul, Weiss, Rifkind 44.8
247. profile image Keoghs Law 44.8
248. profile image Cadwalader 44.8
249. profile image Turcan Connell 44.8
250. profile image McDonald Hopkins LLC 44.8
251. profile image Butler Snow LLP 44.8
252. profile image Farrer & Co 44.7
253. profile image GrayRobinson, P.a. 44.7
254. profile image Dickinson Wright 44.7
255. profile image Morisons Solicitors 44.6
256. profile image William Olson 44.6
257. profile image Deborah McMurray 44.6
258. profile image Stephenson Harwood 44.5
259. profile image Dykema 44.4
260. profile image Carlton Fields 44.4
261. profile image Schnader Harrison 44.3
262. profile image Chadbourne & Parke 44.3
263. profile image Brown Rudnick 44.2
264. profile image Neves Solicitors LLP 44.2
265. profile image Fried Frank 44.1
266. profile image Winthrop & Weinstine 44.1
267. profile image Kramer Levin 44.0
268. profile image Clifford Law 44.0
269. profile image Miller Hendry 43.9
270. profile image Langleys Solicitors 43.8
271. profile image Schiff Hardin LLP 43.8
272. profile image Gillespie Macandrew 43.7
273. profile image Baker & McKenzie MX 43.6
274. profile image Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland 43.6
275. profile image Robinson+Cole 43.4
276. profile image Burford 43.3
277. profile image Day Pitney LLP 43.2
278. profile image Sterne Kessler 43.1
279. profile image Vedder Price 43.1
280. profile image StewartsLawLLP 43.0
281. profile image Gordon & Rees 43.0
282. profile image Boodle Hatfield LLP 42.9
283. profile image Jaburg|Wilk 42.9
284. profile image Fenwick Elliott LLP 42.8
285. profile image Schulte Roth & Zabel 42.8
286. profile image BuckleySandler LLP 42.8
287. profile image Gibbons P.C. 42.7
288. profile image WINSTEAD PC 42.7
289. profile image Lerner And Rowe 42.7
290. profile image Sedgwick LLP 42.4
291. profile image Brinks Gilson 42.4
292. profile image Stites & Harbison 42.4
293. profile image Burns & Levinson LLP 42.2
294. profile image Federal Contracting 42.2
295. profile image PilieroMazza 42.2
296. profile image Sandler Travis, PA 42.1
297. profile image CRS_Family 42.1
298. profile image Infrastructure Law 42.0
299. profile image Macfarlanes LLP 41.9
300. profile image Pullman & Comley 41.9
  • Bulletin name:
    10 Aug 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 10th Aug 2017
  • Score Period:
    3rd Aug - 10th Aug 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 3rd Aug 2017
  • Data Sources: