Social Law Firms 6 Jul 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 6 Jul 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard Page 3

Rank Law Firm Total Score
201. profile image Knobbe Martens 47.4
202. profile image Gide Loyrette Nouel 47.4
203. profile image GrayRobinson, P.a. 47.3
204. profile image Goulston & Storrs 47.3
205. profile image Debevoise & Plimpton 47.1
206. profile image Allen Matkins LLP 47.0
207. profile image ShoosmithsLaw 47.0
208. profile image Bradley 46.9
209. profile image Hunton & Williams 46.8
210. profile image Hughes Hubbard 46.8
211. profile image MMS 46.7
212. profile image Gardere Wynne Sewell 46.7
213. profile image Stephenson Harwood 46.7
214. profile image Gordons LLP 46.6
215. profile image Dawson Cornwell 46.6
216. profile image Snell & Wilmer 46.5
217. profile image Lowenstein Sandler 46.5
218. profile image Basham 46.5
219. profile image Angela Wang & Co 46.2
220. profile image McDonald Hopkins LLC 46.2
221. profile image Goodmans LLP 46.2
222. profile image Frost Brown Todd 46.2
223. profile image Turcan Connell 46.2
224. profile image Howie, Sacks & Henry 46.2
225. profile image Arent Fox LLP 46.2
226. profile image Minster Law 46.1
227. profile image Brownstein Hyatt 46.1
228. profile image Withersworldwide 45.9
229. profile image Deborah McMurray 45.9
230. profile image Dykema 45.9
231. profile image NMM 45.9
232. profile image DLA Piper Australia 45.8
233. profile image Butler Snow LLP 45.8
234. profile image Kramer Levin 45.7
235. profile image StewartsLawLLP 45.5
236. profile image Dinsmore & Shohl 45.5
237. profile image Law Firm Marketing 45.4
238. profile image Morisons Solicitors 45.4
239. profile image Loeb & Loeb LLP 45.3
240. profile image Carlton Fields 45.3
241. profile image DLA Piper Canada 45.2
242. profile image Cravath 45.2
243. profile image Dickinson Wright 45.1
244. profile image Thompson Hine LLP 45.1
245. profile image Forsters LLP 45.1
246. profile image GreenwoodsSolicitors 45.0
247. profile image Kelley Drye & Warren 45.0
248. profile image Neves Solicitors LLP 45.0
249. profile image Troutman Sanders 44.9
250. profile image Waller 44.9
251. profile image Cadwalader 44.8
252. profile image Jackson Walker 44.8
253. profile image Hinshaw & Culbertson 44.7
254. profile image Winthrop & Weinstine 44.6
255. profile image Farrer & Co 44.6
256. profile image Keoghs Law 44.6
257. profile image Clifford Law 44.5
258. profile image Bracewell 44.4
259. profile image Langleys Solicitors 44.4
260. profile image Gillespie Macandrew 44.4
261. profile image Sterne Kessler 44.3
262. profile image Schnader Harrison 44.3
263. profile image Benesch Law 44.3
264. profile image Paul, Weiss, Rifkind 44.3
265. profile image Fried Frank 44.3
266. profile image Vedder Price 44.2
267. profile image Watson Farley & Williams LLP 44.2
268. profile image Chadbourne & Parke 44.2
269. profile image Balfour+Manson LLP 44.1
270. profile image Lerner And Rowe 44.0
271. profile image BuckleySandler LLP 43.9
272. profile image Schulte Roth & Zabel 43.9
273. profile image Baker & McKenzie MX 43.8
274. profile image Miller Hendry 43.8
275. profile image Day Pitney LLP 43.8
276. profile image DavisPolkReg 43.8
277. profile image WINSTEAD PC 43.7
278. profile image Fenwick Elliott LLP 43.6
279. profile image WeisbergKainenMark 43.5
280. profile image Davies 43.4
281. profile image William Olson 43.4
282. profile image Flaster/Greenberg 43.3
283. profile image Brinks Gilson 43.3
284. profile image Sedgwick LLP 43.2
285. profile image Boodle Hatfield LLP 43.2
286. profile image Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland 43.1
287. profile image DE BUEN R. ABOGADOS 43.0
288. profile image Schiff Hardin LLP 43.0
289. profile image Stites & Harbison 42.8
290. profile image Jaburg|Wilk 42.8
291. profile image Burford 42.8
292. profile image CGMB Law Firm 42.3
293. profile image Burns & Levinson LLP 42.1
294. profile image Reminger Co., L.P.a. 42.1
295. profile image Infrastructure Law 42.0
296. profile image Pullman & Comley 42.0
297. profile image Macfarlanes LLP 42.0
298. profile image Thompson & Knight 41.7
299. profile image CRS_Family 41.7
300. profile image MTO 41.6
  • Bulletin name:
    6 Jul 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 6th Jul 2017
  • Score Period:
    29th Jun - 6th Jul 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 29th Jun 2017
  • Data Sources: