Social Law Firms 15 Jun 2017 update

Collective goal

About

Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.

You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week. 

Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.

Log In

By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.

Leaderboard

You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.

Join

"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account.  If you are a bona fide law firm,  you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.

Follow

"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)

Total Score: 0.0

Rise Social Media Social Law Firms Bulletins 15 Jun 2017 update

This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.

We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.

The board will update weekly on Thursdays.

Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.

Leaderboard Page 3

Rank Law Firm Total Score
201. profile image Robinson+Cole 47.3
202. profile image Brownstein Hyatt 47.2
203. profile image Turcan Connell 47.2
204. profile image Anderson Strathern 47.2
205. profile image Snell & Wilmer 47.1
206. profile image Arent Fox LLP 47.1
207. profile image HollandHart 47.1
208. profile image Lowenstein Sandler 47.0
209. profile image Allen Matkins LLP 47.0
210. profile image Bradley 47.0
211. profile image Moore Blatch 46.9
212. profile image Sullivan & Worcester 46.8
213. profile image Nixon Peabody LLP 46.7
214. profile image Dawson Cornwell 46.7
215. profile image Thompson Hine LLP 46.7
216. profile image Hogan Lovells 46.6
217. profile image Dinsmore & Shohl 46.6
218. profile image Gide Loyrette Nouel 46.6
219. profile image McDonald Hopkins LLC 46.6
220. profile image Dorsey & Whitney 46.5
221. profile image ShoosmithsLaw 46.5
222. profile image GrayRobinson, P.a. 46.5
223. profile image DLA Piper Canada 46.5
224. profile image Minster Law 46.5
225. profile image Gordons LLP 46.3
226. profile image Goodmans LLP 46.3
227. profile image Stevens & Bolton 46.3
228. profile image Loeb & Loeb LLP 46.2
229. profile image Stephenson Harwood 46.2
230. profile image Basham 46.1
231. profile image Howie, Sacks & Henry 46.1
232. profile image Angela Wang & Co 46.0
233. profile image NMM 46.0
234. profile image Watson Farley & Williams LLP 45.9
235. profile image Troutman Sanders 45.9
236. profile image Kelley Drye & Warren 45.8
237. profile image Butler Snow LLP 45.8
238. profile image DLA Piper Australia 45.7
239. profile image Hinshaw & Culbertson 45.7
240. profile image Withersworldwide 45.6
241. profile image Vorys 45.5
242. profile image Miller Hendry 45.5
243. profile image Cravath 45.3
244. profile image Dykema 45.3
245. profile image Law Firm Marketing 45.3
246. profile image Deborah McMurray 45.3
247. profile image HFW 45.3
248. profile image Waller 45.2
249. profile image Forsters LLP 45.1
250. profile image Sterne Kessler 45.1
251. profile image Kramer Levin 45.1
252. profile image Dickinson Wright 45.0
253. profile image Vedder Price 44.9
254. profile image Keoghs Law 44.9
255. profile image BuckleySandler LLP 44.9
256. profile image Benesch Law 44.8
257. profile image Neves Solicitors LLP 44.8
258. profile image GreenwoodsSolicitors 44.8
259. profile image Day Pitney LLP 44.7
260. profile image Jackson Walker 44.7
261. profile image StewartsLawLLP 44.7
262. profile image Gillespie Macandrew 44.6
263. profile image Farrer & Co 44.6
264. profile image Carlton Fields 44.5
265. profile image Clifford Law 44.4
266. profile image Paul, Weiss, Rifkind 44.4
267. profile image Flaster/Greenberg 44.4
268. profile image DavisPolkReg 44.1
269. profile image Schulte Roth & Zabel 44.1
270. profile image Langleys Solicitors 44.0
271. profile image Sedgwick LLP 44.0
272. profile image Davies 43.9
273. profile image Cadwalader 43.9
274. profile image Schiff Hardin LLP 43.9
275. profile image Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland 43.8
276. profile image Brinks Gilson 43.7
277. profile image Balfour+Manson LLP 43.7
278. profile image WINSTEAD PC 43.5
279. profile image Fenwick Elliott LLP 43.4
280. profile image Winthrop & Weinstine 43.4
281. profile image Fried Frank 43.3
282. profile image Jaburg|Wilk 43.3
283. profile image Morisons Solicitors 43.2
284. profile image WeisbergKainenMark 43.2
285. profile image William Olson 43.2
286. profile image Schnader Harrison 43.1
287. profile image Lerner And Rowe 42.9
288. profile image Infrastructure Law 42.8
289. profile image Baker & McKenzie MX 42.7
290. profile image Boodle Hatfield LLP 42.7
291. profile image Stites & Harbison 42.6
292. profile image Burford 42.6
293. profile image Gibbons P.C. 42.5
294. profile image Reminger Co., L.P.a. 42.4
295. profile image Stronachs LLP 42.2
296. profile image DE BUEN R. ABOGADOS 42.2
297. profile image Gordon & Rees 42.1
298. profile image Chadbourne & Parke 42.1
299. profile image Macfarlanes LLP 42.1
300. profile image Burns & Levinson LLP 41.9
  • Bulletin name:
    15 Jun 2017 update
  • Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 15th Jun 2017
  • Score Period:
    8th Jun - 15th Jun 2017
  • Previous Bulletin name:
  • Previous Bulletin published at:
    9:00am - 8th Jun 2017
  • Data Sources: