About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.Â
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201. | (209) |
|
MMS | 46.9 |
| 202. | (194) |
|
Cordell & Cordell | 46.9 |
| 203. | (192) |
|
Gide Loyrette Nouel | 46.9 |
| 204. | (191) |
|
GrayRobinson, P.a. | 46.9 |
| 205. | (181) |
|
Lindsays Solicitors | 46.9 |
| 206. | (218) |
|
Baker Botts | 46.9 |
| 207. | (197) |
|
Stoel Rives LLP | 46.8 |
| 208. | (182) |
|
Dawson Cornwell | 46.7 |
| 209. | (212) |
|
Bircham Dyson Bell | 46.7 |
| 210. | (203) |
|
Hughes Hubbard | 46.5 |
| 211. | (216) |
|
Sullivan & Worcester | 46.5 |
| 212. | (202) |
|
Kelley Drye & Warren | 46.5 |
| 213. | (196) |
|
Travers Smith | 46.5 |
| 214. | (210) |
|
Snell & Wilmer | 46.5 |
| 215. | (221) |
|
Frost Brown Todd | 46.4 |
| 216. | (214) |
|
Dorsey & Whitney | 46.4 |
| 217. | (207) |
|
HollandHart | 46.3 |
| 218. | (208) |
|
Gordons LLP | 46.3 |
| 219. | (220) |
|
Aird & Berlis LLP | 46.3 |
| 220. | (206) |
|
Archer & Greiner | 46.3 |
| 221. | (217) |
|
Howie, Sacks & Henry | 46.3 |
| 222. | (228) |
|
Moore Blatch | 46.1 |
| 223. | (225) |
|
Waller | 46.1 |
| 224. | (262) |
|
Goulston & Storrs | 46.0 |
| 225. | (230) |
|
Jenner & Block | 46.0 |
| 226. | (224) |
|
Butler Snow LLP | 46.0 |
| 227. | (236) |
|
Gillespie Macandrew | 45.9 |
| 228. | (223) |
|
Lowenstein Sandler | 45.9 |
| 229. | (244) |
|
Dickinson Wright | 45.8 |
| 230. | (227) |
|
DavisPolkReg | 45.8 |
| 231. | (215) |
|
Brownstein Hyatt | 45.8 |
| 232. | (254) |
|
Sedgwick LLP | 45.7 |
| 233. | (231) |
|
NMM | 45.7 |
| 234. | (233) |
|
Gardere Wynne Sewell | 45.7 |
| 235. | (222) |
|
Hinshaw & Culbertson | 45.6 |
| 236. | (245) |
|
Loeb & Loeb LLP | 45.6 |
| 237. | (234) |
|
Miller Canfield | 45.6 |
| 238. | (235) |
|
Cadwalader | 45.6 |
| 239. | (226) |
|
Minster Law | 45.6 |
| 240. | (251) |
|
Keoghs Law | 45.5 |
| 241. | (250) |
|
Angela Wang & Co | 45.5 |
| 242. | (238) |
|
Basham | 45.5 |
| 243. | (240) |
|
Hunton & Williams | 45.5 |
| 244. | (239) |
|
Miller Hendry | 45.5 |
| 245. | (246) |
|
Vedder Price | 45.4 |
| 246. | (241) |
|
Law Firm Marketing | 45.4 |
| 247. | (283) |
|
Dinsmore & Shohl | 45.4 |
| 248. | (229) |
|
Carlton Fields | 45.4 |
| 249. | (256) |
|
Watson Farley & Williams LLP | 45.3 |
| 250. | (281) |
|
Sterne Kessler | 45.2 |
| 251. | (232) |
|
Morisons Solicitors | 45.2 |
| 252. | (247) |
|
Schulte Roth & Zabel | 45.0 |
| 253. | (258) |
|
GreenwoodsSolicitors | 44.9 |
| 254. | (253) |
|
Dykema | 44.9 |
| 255. | (237) |
|
Flaster/Greenberg | 44.9 |
| 256. | (242) |
|
HBJ Gateley | 44.8 |
| 257. | (257) |
|
Langleys Solicitors | 44.8 |
| 258. | (255) |
|
Cravath | 44.8 |
| 259. | (243) |
|
BuckleySandler LLP | 44.8 |
| 260. | (249) |
|
Stevens & Bolton | 44.8 |
| 261. | (248) |
|
Benesch Law | 44.7 |
| 262. | (278) |
|
Stites & Harbison | 44.7 |
| 263. | (260) |
|
HFW | 44.6 |
| 264. | (329) |
|
Neves Solicitors LLP | 44.6 |
| 265. | (271) |
|
Balfour+Manson LLP | 44.5 |
| 266. | (261) |
|
Winthrop & Weinstine | 44.4 |
| 267. | (346) |
|
Beltrami & Co | 44.4 |
| 268. | (274) |
|
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind | 44.4 |
| 269. | (268) |
|
LaPolt Law | 44.2 |
| 270. | (273) |
|
Farrer & Co | 44.2 |
| 271. | (264) |
|
Forsters LLP | 44.2 |
| 272. | (270) |
|
Thompson Hine LLP | 44.1 |
| 273. | (259) |
|
Stephenson Harwood | 44.1 |
| 274. | (265) |
|
Brinks Gilson | 44.1 |
| 275. | (267) |
|
Jackson Walker | 44.1 |
| 276. | (279) |
|
Fenwick Elliott LLP | 44.1 |
| 277. | (276) |
|
StewartsLawLLP | 44.1 |
| 278. | (275) |
|
Vorys | 44.0 |
| 279. | (263) |
|
Clifford Law | 44.0 |
| 280. | (269) |
|
WeisbergKainenMark | 43.9 |
| 281. | (289) |
|
Macfarlanes LLP | 43.9 |
| 282. | (280) |
|
Jaburg|Wilk | 43.9 |
| 283. | (277) |
|
DLA Piper Australia | 43.8 |
| 284. | (266) |
|
Davies | 43.8 |
| 285. | (272) |
|
Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland | 43.7 |
| 286. | (288) |
|
Miller & Martin PLLC | 43.4 |
| 287. | (287) |
|
Day Pitney LLP | 43.4 |
| 288. | (286) |
|
WINSTEAD PC | 43.3 |
| 289. | (295) |
|
Schiff Hardin LLP | 43.1 |
| 290. | (285) |
|
Fried Frank | 43.0 |
| 291. | (309) |
|
Infrastructure Law | 43.0 |
| 292. | (293) |
|
Fladgate LLP | 42.9 |
| 293. | (282) |
|
Gibbons P.C. | 42.9 |
| 294. | (297) |
|
Baker & McKenzie MX | 42.6 |
| 295. | (315) |
|
Burg Simpson | 42.6 |
| 296. | (200) |
|
Cripps | 42.6 |
| 297. | (299) |
|
Boodle Hatfield LLP | 42.5 |
| 298. | (303) |
|
Schnader Harrison | 42.5 |
| 299. | (294) |
|
Pullman & Comley | 42.5 |
| 300. | (340) |
|
Burford | 42.4 |
