About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.Â
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201. | (189) |
|
Snell & Wilmer | 46.5 |
| 202. | (190) |
|
Brownstein Hyatt | 46.5 |
| 203. | (200) |
|
Bradley | 46.4 |
| 204. | (212) |
|
Arent Fox LLP | 46.4 |
| 205. | (207) |
|
Loeb & Loeb LLP | 46.4 |
| 206. | (213) |
|
Howie, Sacks & Henry | 46.4 |
| 207. | (196) |
|
Cadwalader | 46.3 |
| 208. | (217) |
|
Cripps | 46.3 |
| 209. | (209) |
|
Dorsey & Whitney | 46.2 |
| 210. | (249) |
|
Kramer Levin | 46.2 |
| 211. | (188) |
|
CMS Scotland | 46.2 |
| 212. | (216) |
|
Aird & Berlis LLP | 46.2 |
| 213. | (197) |
|
Gide Loyrette Nouel | 46.2 |
| 214. | (220) |
|
Frost Brown Todd | 46.1 |
| 215. | (206) |
|
McDonald Hopkins LLC | 46.0 |
| 216. | (219) |
|
Jenner & Block | 45.9 |
| 217. | (215) |
|
Travers Smith | 45.9 |
| 218. | (203) |
|
Gillespie Macandrew | 45.9 |
| 219. | (214) |
|
Sullivan & Worcester | 45.9 |
| 220. | (204) |
|
DMH Stallard | 45.8 |
| 221. | (230) |
|
Hughes Hubbard | 45.8 |
| 222. | (233) |
|
Carlton Fields | 45.8 |
| 223. | (221) |
|
Cordell & Cordell | 45.7 |
| 224. | (283) |
|
Basham | 45.7 |
| 225. | (202) |
|
Schulte Roth & Zabel | 45.7 |
| 226. | (237) |
|
Gordons LLP | 45.7 |
| 227. | (235) |
|
Moore Blatch | 45.6 |
| 228. | (227) |
|
Minster Law | 45.6 |
| 229. | (265) |
|
StewartsLawLLP | 45.6 |
| 230. | (208) |
|
Miller Canfield | 45.5 |
| 231. | (218) |
|
Your Legal Friend | 45.5 |
| 232. | (232) |
|
Benesch Law | 45.4 |
| 233. | (223) |
|
Lowenstein Sandler | 45.4 |
| 234. | (229) |
|
Neves Solicitors LLP | 45.4 |
| 235. | (224) |
|
DavisPolkReg | 45.3 |
| 236. | (225) |
|
Goodmans LLP | 45.3 |
| 237. | (234) |
|
Angela Wang & Co | 45.2 |
| 238. | (256) |
|
Dykema | 45.2 |
| 239. | (226) |
|
Butler Snow LLP | 45.1 |
| 240. | (245) |
|
GrayRobinson, P.a. | 45.1 |
| 241. | (302) |
|
BuckleySandler LLP | 45.0 |
| 242. | (238) |
|
Dickinson Wright | 44.9 |
| 243. | (240) |
|
Jackson Walker | 44.9 |
| 244. | (243) |
|
Gardere Wynne Sewell | 44.9 |
| 245. | (242) |
|
Goulston & Storrs | 44.8 |
| 246. | (228) |
|
Archer & Greiner | 44.8 |
| 247. | (239) |
|
Waller | 44.8 |
| 248. | (246) |
|
Law Firm Marketing | 44.8 |
| 249. | (248) |
|
NMM | 44.7 |
| 250. | (222) |
|
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind | 44.7 |
| 251. | (244) |
|
Stephenson Harwood | 44.7 |
| 252. | (231) |
|
HFW | 44.5 |
| 253. | (253) |
|
WeisbergKainenMark | 44.5 |
| 254. | (273) |
|
Forsters LLP | 44.4 |
| 255. | (251) |
|
Jaburg|Wilk | 44.3 |
| 256. | (241) |
|
Langleys Solicitors | 44.3 |
| 257. | (252) |
|
Anderson Strathern | 44.2 |
| 258. | (286) |
|
DLA Piper Australia | 44.1 |
| 259. | (247) |
|
Thompson Hine LLP | 44.1 |
| 260. | (259) |
|
Keoghs Law | 44.0 |
| 261. | (255) |
|
Hunton & Williams | 44.0 |
| 262. | (274) |
|
Sedgwick LLP | 44.0 |
| 263. | (278) |
|
HBJ Gateley | 43.8 |
| 264. | (300) |
|
Willkie | 43.8 |
| 265. | (258) |
|
Dinsmore & Shohl | 43.8 |
| 266. | (257) |
|
Davies | 43.8 |
| 267. | (254) |
|
GreenwoodsSolicitors | 43.7 |
| 268. | (279) |
|
Stevens & Bolton | 43.6 |
| 269. | (295) |
|
Law At Work | 43.6 |
| 270. | (291) |
|
Vedder Price | 43.5 |
| 271. | (299) |
|
Murthy Law Firm | 43.5 |
| 272. | (262) |
|
Fladgate LLP | 43.4 |
| 273. | (260) |
|
Vorys | 43.4 |
| 274. | (271) |
|
Clifford Law | 43.4 |
| 275. | (287) |
|
Flaster/Greenberg | 43.4 |
| 276. | (293) |
|
Winthrop & Weinstine | 43.2 |
| 277. | (272) |
|
Fenwick Elliott LLP | 43.2 |
| 278. | (267) |
|
Lerner And Rowe | 43.2 |
| 279. | (268) |
|
Brinks Gilson | 43.2 |
| 280. | (261) |
|
Stites & Harbison | 43.2 |
| 281. | (276) |
|
CRS_Family | 43.1 |
| 282. | (263) |
|
Burg Simpson | 43.1 |
| 283. | (288) |
|
Day Pitney LLP | 43.0 |
| 284. | (264) |
|
Turcan Connell | 42.9 |
| 285. | (285) |
|
Boodle Hatfield LLP | 42.9 |
| 286. | (269) |
|
Baker & McKenzie MX | 42.9 |
| 287. | (296) |
|
Miller Hendry | 42.9 |
| 288. | (277) |
|
WINSTEAD PC | 42.8 |
| 289. | (281) |
|
Fried Frank | 42.8 |
| 290. | (266) |
|
Cravath | 42.8 |
| 291. | (270) |
|
Miller & Martin PLLC | 42.8 |
| 292. | (307) |
|
Burns & Levinson LLP | 42.6 |
| 293. | (297) |
|
Farrer & Co | 42.6 |
| 294. | (280) |
|
KWM EMEA | 42.5 |
| 295. | (282) |
|
Goldberg & Osborne | 42.5 |
| 296. | (275) |
|
Balfour+Manson LLP | 42.4 |
| 297. | (311) |
|
Thompson & Knight | 42.4 |
| 298. | (292) |
|
Macfarlanes LLP | 42.4 |
| 299. | (290) |
|
Infrastructure Law | 42.3 |
| 300. | (289) |
|
Morisons Solicitors | 42.3 |
