About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
This week we saw the biggest climbs from Foley Hoag LLP (up 153 places to 83rd), BLM (up 146 places to 155th), and Thorntons Law LLP (up 84 places to 97th).
Well done to this week's top three Proskauer Rose LLP, Fox Rothschild LLP, and Cozen O'Connor.
Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | (1) |
![]() |
Proskauer Rose LLP | 77.8 |
2. | (2) |
![]() |
Fox Rothschild LLP | 76.4 |
3. | (4) |
![]() |
Cozen O'Connor | 71.6 |
4. | (3) |
![]() |
McCarter English | 69.7 |
5. | (6) |
![]() |
CMS Cameron McKenna | 64.9 |
6. | (5) |
![]() |
White & Case LLP | 64.9 |
7. | (7) |
![]() |
Irwin Mitchell | 61.9 |
8. | (8) |
![]() |
Baker & McKenzie | 61.0 |
9. | (9) |
![]() |
FenwickWest | 60.7 |
10. | (10) |
![]() |
DLA Piper | 60.7 |
11. | (12) |
![]() |
Taylor Wessing LLP | 60.2 |
12. | (11) |
![]() |
Cooley LLP | 59.8 |
13. | (17) |
![]() |
Dentons | 59.6 |
14. | (20) |
![]() |
NortonRoseFulbright | 58.9 |
15. | (15) |
![]() |
Allen & Overy | 58.7 |
16. | (13) |
![]() |
JONES DAY® | 58.6 |
17. | (26) |
![]() |
Walker Morris LLP | 57.7 |
18. | (18) |
![]() |
Hogan Lovells | 57.1 |
19. | (16) |
![]() |
Bad Legal LLP | 57.1 |
20. | (14) |
![]() |
Eversheds | 57.0 |
21. | (19) |
![]() |
Pinsent Masons | 56.5 |
22. | (25) |
![]() |
Morgan Lewis | 56.4 |
23. | (30) |
![]() |
Stowe Family Law LLP | 55.9 |
24. | (22) |
![]() |
Mishcon De Reya | 55.8 |
25. | (24) |
![]() |
GreenbergTraurig LLP | 55.8 |
26. | (31) |
![]() |
Clifford Chance UK | 55.7 |
27. | (23) |
![]() |
Osborne Clarke | 55.6 |
28. | (21) |
![]() |
Orrick | 55.3 |
29. | (27) |
![]() |
Mills & Reeve LLP | 55.3 |
30. | (32) |
![]() |
Squire Patton Boggs | 55.3 |
31. | (45) |
![]() |
@BlakeMorganLLP | 55.2 |
32. | (46) |
![]() |
Linklaters LLP | 55.1 |
33. | (43) |
![]() |
Royds Withy King | 54.7 |
34. | (28) |
![]() |
Reed Smith LLP | 54.6 |
35. | (36) |
![]() |
Latham & Watkins LLP | 54.3 |
36. | (35) |
![]() |
Skadden, Arps | 54.2 |
37. | (48) |
![]() |
Clyde & | 54.1 |
38. | (29) |
![]() |
Goodwin | 54.1 |
39. | (37) |
![]() |
Seyfarth Shaw LLP | 54.0 |
40. | (41) |
![]() |
Sidley Austin LLP | 53.9 |
41. | (40) |
![]() |
Fasken Martineau | 53.9 |
42. | (34) |
![]() |
Covington | 53.8 |
43. | (39) |
![]() |
K&L Gates LLP | 53.7 |
44. | (33) |
![]() |
Fisher Phillips | 53.7 |
45. | (38) |
![]() |
Deloitte México | 53.5 |
46. | (68) |
![]() |
Gowling WLG UK | 53.4 |
47. | (49) |
![]() |
Olswang LLP | 53.3 |
48. | (44) |
![]() |
Bird & Bird | 53.2 |
49. | (50) |
![]() |
McDermott | 53.1 |
50. | (69) |
![]() |
Osler | 53.1 |
51. | (42) |
![]() |
Burges Salmon | 52.9 |
52. | (55) |
![]() |
Dechert | 52.8 |
53. | (57) |
![]() |
Wilson Sonsini | 52.7 |
54. | (52) |
![]() |
Michelmores LLP | 52.4 |
55. | (51) |
![]() |
Gowling WLG | 52.4 |
56. | (59) |
![]() |
Bryan Cave LLP | 52.3 |
57. | (53) |
![]() |
Simpson Millar LLP | 52.2 |
58. | (56) |
![]() |
Mintz Levin | 52.1 |
59. | (60) |
![]() |
Hymans Robertson LLP | 51.9 |
60. | (100) |
![]() |
Weightmans LLP | 51.8 |
61. | (47) |
![]() |
Pepper Hamilton LLP | 51.8 |
62. | (92) |
![]() |
Mayer Brown | 51.8 |
63. | (54) |
![]() |
Ogletree Deakins | 51.7 |
64. | (64) |
![]() |
Nixon Peabody LLP | 51.7 |
65. | (70) |
![]() |
Harper Macleod LLP | 51.7 |
66. | (63) |
![]() |
MLex | 51.6 |
67. | (58) |
![]() |
Littler Mendelson | 51.6 |
68. | (65) |
![]() |
Perkins Coie | 51.6 |
69. | (71) |
![]() |
DWF LLP | 51.4 |
70. | (129) |
![]() |
Bennett Jones | 51.4 |
71. | (67) |
![]() |
Birketts LLP | 51.4 |
72. | (66) |
![]() |
Geldards | 51.3 |
73. | (79) |
![]() |
Allens (Law Firm) | 51.3 |
74. | (72) |
![]() |
Brodies LLP | 51.3 |
75. | (77) |
![]() |
Ashfords LLP | 51.2 |
76. | (73) |
![]() |
Blank Rome LLP | 51.2 |
77. | (62) |
![]() |
Ashurst | 51.2 |
78. | (113) |
![]() |
King & Spalding | 51.2 |
79. | (84) |
![]() |
Winston & Strawn LLP | 51.2 |
80. | (89) |
![]() |
Thrings Solicitors | 51.1 |
81. | (74) |
![]() |
Trowers & Hamlins | 51.1 |
82. | (82) |
![]() |
Steptoe&JohnsonLLP | 51.0 |
83. | (236) |
![]() |
Foley Hoag LLP | 51.0 |
84. | (80) |
![]() |
Knobbe Martens | 50.9 |
85. | (76) |
![]() |
WilmerHale | 50.9 |
86. | (83) |
![]() |
SCHR | 50.8 |
87. | (87) |
![]() |
Stephensons | 50.8 |
88. | (75) |
![]() |
Addleshaw Goddard | 50.7 |
89. | (124) |
![]() |
Weil | 50.7 |
90. | (91) |
![]() |
Jackson Lewis P.C. | 50.7 |
91. | (85) |
![]() |
Womble Carlyle | 50.6 |
92. | (110) |
![]() |
KattenLaw | 50.6 |
93. | (78) |
![]() |
ShakespeareMartineau | 50.6 |
94. | (96) |
![]() |
Kirkland & Ellis | 50.5 |
95. | (90) |
![]() |
Drinker Biddle | 50.4 |
96. | (86) |
![]() |
Ince & Co | 50.4 |
97. | (181) |
![]() |
Thorntons Law LLP | 50.4 |
98. | (88) |
![]() |
Holland & Knight | 50.3 |
99. | (97) |
![]() |
Foley & Lardner LLP | 50.2 |
100. | (98) |
![]() |
PILPG | 50.2 |