About
Top Social Law Firms is a free online success tracking service specifically for law firms all over the world.
You can use the service to track your firm's social influence score as measured by Klout, updated once a week.Â
Why? So that you can see if you are improving your influence on social media then you are demonstrating your readiness for law in the digital 21st century.
Log In
By logging in you'll see your personal dashboard tracking your score over the past year.
Leaderboard
You can also see a "leaderboard" to see who are the the other leaders in your community.
Join
"Join" the list (link on the leaderboard page) with your Twitter account. If you are a bona fide law firm, you will be included in the list and your score will be published in the next release.
Follow
"Follow" the leaderboard (link on the leaderboard page) to receive an email update every time the board releases with new results (weekly)
This Rise board lists Law Firms from all around the world that have a presence on Twitter and ranks them on their social media influence.
We use Klout scores as a measure of social media influence.
The board will update weekly on Thursdays.
Click on "Join" if you wish to be included in the list and "Follow" if you wish to get a weekly update on how the firms score every week, the risers and fallers and relevant news about the community.
| Rank | Law Firm | Total Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201. | (201) |
|
MMS | 46.5 |
| 202. | (200) |
|
Stoel Rives LLP | 46.5 |
| 203. | (210) |
|
Gordons LLP | 46.5 |
| 204. | (199) |
|
Withersworldwide | 46.4 |
| 205. | (212) |
|
Goodmans LLP | 46.4 |
| 206. | (196) |
|
CMS Scotland | 46.4 |
| 207. | (211) |
|
Sullivan & Worcester | 46.4 |
| 208. | (230) |
|
Howie, Sacks & Henry | 46.3 |
| 209. | (221) |
|
Snell & Wilmer | 46.3 |
| 210. | (197) |
|
Allen Matkins LLP | 46.2 |
| 211. | (205) |
|
Your Legal Friend | 46.2 |
| 212. | (220) |
|
Brabners LLP | 46.2 |
| 213. | (208) |
|
KWM EMEA | 46.1 |
| 214. | (219) |
|
Gide Loyrette Nouel | 46.1 |
| 215. | (207) |
|
DLA Piper Australia | 46.1 |
| 216. | (189) |
|
Troutman Sanders | 46.0 |
| 217. | (222) |
|
Frost Brown Todd | 46.0 |
| 218. | (206) |
|
Cadwalader | 45.9 |
| 219. | (218) |
|
Fried Frank | 45.9 |
| 220. | (224) |
|
McDonald Hopkins LLC | 45.9 |
| 221. | (216) |
|
Hunton & Williams | 45.7 |
| 222. | (227) |
|
Kelley Drye & Warren | 45.7 |
| 223. | (217) |
|
Anderson Strathern | 45.6 |
| 224. | (228) |
|
GrayRobinson, P.a. | 45.6 |
| 225. | (209) |
|
Aird & Berlis LLP | 45.5 |
| 226. | (235) |
|
Carlton Fields | 45.4 |
| 227. | (238) |
|
Law Firm Marketing | 45.4 |
| 228. | (300) |
|
Burford | 45.4 |
| 229. | (215) |
|
Kaye Scholer | 45.3 |
| 230. | (229) |
|
DLA Piper Canada | 45.3 |
| 231. | (231) |
|
Benesch Law | 45.3 |
| 232. | (223) |
|
Travers Smith | 45.3 |
| 233. | (234) |
|
Turcan Connell | 45.2 |
| 234. | (226) |
|
Brownstein Hyatt | 45.2 |
| 235. | (243) |
|
Cravath | 45.2 |
| 236. | (232) |
|
Dykema | 45.2 |
| 237. | (233) |
|
Basham | 45.1 |
| 238. | (245) |
|
Arent Fox LLP | 45.1 |
| 239. | (272) |
|
Minster Law | 45.0 |
| 240. | (247) |
|
WeisbergKainenMark | 45.0 |
| 241. | (225) |
|
Miller Canfield | 44.9 |
| 242. | (264) |
|
Archer & Greiner | 44.9 |
| 243. | (240) |
|
Davies | 44.8 |
| 244. | (253) |
|
Clifford Law | 44.7 |
| 245. | (241) |
|
William Olson | 44.7 |
| 246. | (269) |
|
Dinsmore & Shohl | 44.7 |
| 247. | (246) |
|
Gardere Wynne Sewell | 44.6 |
| 248. | (237) |
|
Jackson Walker | 44.6 |
| 249. | (244) |
|
DavisPolkReg | 44.5 |
| 250. | (236) |
|
Schulte Roth & Zabel | 44.5 |
| 251. | (267) |
|
BuckleySandler LLP | 44.4 |
| 252. | (257) |
|
Dickinson Wright | 44.3 |
| 253. | (252) |
|
NMM | 44.3 |
| 254. | (259) |
|
Jaburg|Wilk | 44.3 |
| 255. | (268) |
|
Keoghs Law | 44.3 |
| 256. | (251) |
|
Stephenson Harwood | 44.2 |
| 257. | (249) |
|
Waller | 44.2 |
| 258. | (256) |
|
Morisons Solicitors | 44.2 |
| 259. | (261) |
|
Flaster/Greenberg | 44.1 |
| 260. | (254) |
|
Hinshaw & Culbertson | 44.0 |
| 261. | (273) |
|
Kramer Levin | 44.0 |
| 262. | (278) |
|
Lerner And Rowe | 44.0 |
| 263. | (248) |
|
Neves Solicitors LLP | 44.0 |
| 264. | (250) |
|
Winthrop & Weinstine | 44.0 |
| 265. | (239) |
|
Deborah McMurray | 44.0 |
| 266. | (242) |
|
Stevens & Bolton | 43.9 |
| 267. | (258) |
|
IM Business | 43.9 |
| 268. | (266) |
|
Baker & McKenzie MX | 43.8 |
| 269. | (270) |
|
Burns & Levinson LLP | 43.7 |
| 270. | (284) |
|
Burg Simpson | 43.7 |
| 271. | (271) |
|
Fladgate LLP | 43.7 |
| 272. | (262) |
|
Thompson Hine LLP | 43.7 |
| 273. | (255) |
|
HBJ Gateley | 43.7 |
| 274. | (280) |
|
Miller & Martin PLLC | 43.6 |
| 275. | (263) |
|
Moore Blatch | 43.5 |
| 276. | (260) |
|
Chadbourne & Parke | 43.4 |
| 277. | (214) |
|
Jenner & Block | 43.4 |
| 278. | (277) |
|
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind | 43.3 |
| 279. | (286) |
|
Lindquist & Vennum | 43.2 |
| 280. | (265) |
|
Fenwick Elliott LLP | 43.2 |
| 281. | (283) |
|
Hughes Hubbard | 43.1 |
| 282. | (285) |
|
Vedder Price | 43.0 |
| 283. | (294) |
|
Boodle Hatfield LLP | 43.0 |
| 284. | (299) |
|
Vorys | 42.9 |
| 285. | (295) |
|
Sedgwick LLP | 42.9 |
| 286. | (282) |
|
Willkie | 42.9 |
| 287. | (275) |
|
LaPolt Law | 42.9 |
| 288. | (274) |
|
CRS_Family | 42.9 |
| 289. | (279) |
|
Gordon & Rees | 42.8 |
| 290. | (276) |
|
GreenwoodsSolicitors | 42.8 |
| 291. | (289) |
|
Thompson & Knight | 42.8 |
| 292. | (288) |
|
Reminger Co., L.P.a. | 42.8 |
| 293. | (287) |
|
WINSTEAD PC | 42.8 |
| 294. | (290) |
|
Brinks Gilson | 42.6 |
| 295. | (293) |
|
Watson Farley & Williams LLP | 42.6 |
| 296. | (291) |
|
Infrastructure Law | 42.5 |
| 297. | (298) |
|
Farrer & Co | 42.1 |
| 298. | (292) |
|
Balfour+Manson LLP | 42.0 |
| 299. | (296) |
|
Brown Rudnick | 41.9 |
| 300. | (308) |
|
Schnader Harrison | 41.9 |
